On 9/30/2016 5:27 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>> >> What's the drawback, if any? >> > >> > I don't see any drawback to be honest. > I'd go for it then, if Bjorn doesn't hate it. > I posted a follow up patch a minute ago. [PATCH 1/3] Revert "ACPI,PCI,IRQ: reduce static IRQ array size to 16" [PATCH 2/3] ACPI, PCI IRQ: add PCI_USING penalty for ISA interrupts [PATCH 3/3] Revert "ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function" Can we have some testing coverage? and eventually have tested-by? -- Sinan Kaya Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
