Am Montag, den 09.11.2015, 16:18 +0530 schrieb Sanjeev Sharma: > If additional PCIe switch get connected between the > host and the NIC,the kernel crashes with "BUG: > scheduling while atomic". To handle this we need to > call mdelay() instead of usleep_range(). > > For more detail please refer bugzilla.kernel.org, Bug > 100031 > > Signed-off-by: Sanjeev Sharma <sanjeev_sharma@xxxxxxxxxx> This is wrong. You are not the author of this patch and this should be reflected both in the From: line as well as in the order of signoffs. > Signed-off-by: David Mueller <dave.mueller@xxxxxx> > --- > drivers/pci/host/pci-imx6.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-imx6.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-imx6.c > index 233a196..9769b13 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-imx6.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-imx6.c > @@ -499,7 +499,7 @@ static int imx6_pcie_link_up(struct pcie_port *pp) > * Wait a little bit, then re-check if the link finished > * the training. > */ > - usleep_range(1000, 2000); > + mdelay(1000); A mdelay(1000) is a whole different timescale than a usleep(1000). If this patch works for you with mdelay(1) or maybe mdelay(2) I would be fine with it. Regards, Lucas > } > /* > * From L0, initiate MAC entry to gen2 if EP/RC supports gen2. -- Pengutronix e.K. | Lucas Stach | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
