Hi Bjorn,
I'm going to respin this patch to fix it regarding Pratyushs comment.
In such a situation do you prefer a repost of the whole series or rather
just have the single fixed patch reposted?
Regards,
Lucas
Am Mittwoch, den 12.08.2015, 21:05 +0530 schrieb Pratyush Anand:
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 3:03 PM, Lucas Stach <l.stach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Set up the high part of the MSI target address in order to allow the
> > MSI target to reside above the 4GB mark on 64bit and PAE systems.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c | 9 ++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
> > index 74034395cf2a..fcb798e47c30 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
> > @@ -299,12 +299,15 @@ no_valid_irq:
> > static void dw_msi_setup_msg(struct pcie_port *pp, unsigned int irq, u32 pos)
> > {
> > struct msi_msg msg;
> > + u64 msi_target;
> >
> > if (pp->ops->get_msi_addr)
> > - msg.address_lo = pp->ops->get_msi_addr(pp);
> > + msi_target = pp->ops->get_msi_addr(pp);
> > else
> > - msg.address_lo = virt_to_phys((void *)pp->msi_data);
> > - msg.address_hi = 0x0;
> > + msi_target = virt_to_phys((void *)pp->msi_data);
> > +
> > + msg.address_lo = (u32)(msi_target & 0xffffffff);
> > + msg.address_hi = (u32)(msi_target >> 32 & 0xffffffff);
> >
> > if (pp->ops->get_msi_data)
> > msg.data = pp->ops->get_msi_data(pp, pos);
>
> Other than above, dw_pcie_msi_init also need to be fixed
> for PCIE_MSI_ADDR_HI.
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Lucas Stach |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
