On 26.05.2015 19:08, Will Deacon wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 01:49:18PM +0100, Hanjun Guo wrote:
From: Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@xxxxxxxxxx>
ECAM standard and MCFG table are architecture independent and it makes
sense to share common code across all architectures. Both are going to
corresponding files - ecam.c and mcfg.c
While we are here, rename pci_parse_mcfg to acpi_parse_mcfg.
We already have acpi_parse_mcfg prototype which is used nowhere.
At the same time, we need pci_parse_mcfg been global so acpi_parse_mcfg
can be used perfectly here.
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@xxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/Kconfig | 3 +
arch/x86/include/asm/pci_x86.h | 33 ------
arch/x86/pci/acpi.c | 1 +
arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c | 244 +---------------------------------------
arch/x86/pci/mmconfig_32.c | 1 +
arch/x86/pci/mmconfig_64.c | 1 +
arch/x86/pci/numachip.c | 1 +
drivers/acpi/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/acpi/mcfg.c | 57 ++++++++++
drivers/pci/Kconfig | 7 ++
drivers/pci/Makefile | 5 +
drivers/pci/ecam.c | 245 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Why can't we make use of the ECAM implementation used by pci-host-generic
and drivers/pci/access.c?
We had that question when I had posted MMCFG patch set separately,
please see:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/11/492
Tomasz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
