On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 01:49:18PM +0100, Hanjun Guo wrote: > From: Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@xxxxxxxxxx> > > ECAM standard and MCFG table are architecture independent and it makes > sense to share common code across all architectures. Both are going to > corresponding files - ecam.c and mcfg.c > > While we are here, rename pci_parse_mcfg to acpi_parse_mcfg. > We already have acpi_parse_mcfg prototype which is used nowhere. > At the same time, we need pci_parse_mcfg been global so acpi_parse_mcfg > can be used perfectly here. > > Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@xxxxxxxxxx> > Tested-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@xxxxxxx> > --- > arch/x86/Kconfig | 3 + > arch/x86/include/asm/pci_x86.h | 33 ------ > arch/x86/pci/acpi.c | 1 + > arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c | 244 +--------------------------------------- > arch/x86/pci/mmconfig_32.c | 1 + > arch/x86/pci/mmconfig_64.c | 1 + > arch/x86/pci/numachip.c | 1 + > drivers/acpi/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/acpi/mcfg.c | 57 ++++++++++ > drivers/pci/Kconfig | 7 ++ > drivers/pci/Makefile | 5 + > drivers/pci/ecam.c | 245 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Why can't we make use of the ECAM implementation used by pci-host-generic and drivers/pci/access.c? Will -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
