On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 1:17 AM, Wei Yang <weiyang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 04:34:57PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote: >>On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 04:21:34PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote: >>> >>> I don't see any patches that resolve the regression (bug 85491) yet. If we >>> don't figure something out, I'm going to have to revert 5b28541552ef. >> >>As you don't like idea to clear the MEM64 bit in resource ... >> >>After this merging window, I would like to post 5 patches in >> >>https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/yinghai/linux-yinghai.git/log/?h=for-pci-allocate-fit-3.18 >>that will make those two systems works with "pci=realloc". >> >>We could have another patch that enable pci=realloc when VGA bar get >>rejected at the first point. >> >>The point is there is no performance difference between two solutions according >>to Marek's test. > > One quick question. > > The patch in http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-pci/msg37377.html doesn't use > "pci=realloc" as it mentioned. And seem worked on Marek's machine. > > We wouldn't take it into consideration? Nope. https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/19/392 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
