On Wednesday 26 November 2014 21:18:03 Thierry Reding wrote: > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 05:55:05PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Wednesday 26 November 2014 17:21:37 Thierry Reding wrote: > > > - > > > + pci_add_resource_offset(&sys->resources, &pcie->pio, sys->io_offset); > > > pci_add_resource_offset(&sys->resources, &pcie->mem, sys->mem_offset); > > > pci_add_resource_offset(&sys->resources, &pcie->prefetch, > > > sys->mem_offset); > > > > > > > You don't set sys->io_offset anywhere, which is a bug if you have multiple > > instances of the PCI host in one system. In my draft patch, I was setting > > both io_offset and mem_offset for consistency, and while mem_offset would > > in practice be always zero (as discussed on IRC), the io_offset in fact has > > a realistic chance of being nonzero and you should definitely set it. > > I was going to do that in a follow-up patch since it isn't needed to fix > this particular regression. Makes sense, but then I think you can do the request_resource() and pci_add_resource_offset() additions in the same follow-up patch as well, and only change the computation in the regression fix. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html