On 2014/11/14 9:31, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Fri, 14 Nov 2014, Yijing Wang wrote: > > Could you please use a mail client which does proper line wraps or > configure yours to do so? > >> Associate the irq domain and PCI bus is not necessary, because all >> PCI buses under same host bridge always share same MSI chip/irq >> domain, we only need associate them and pci host bridge. >> >> I'm refactoring the pci_host_bridge, make it be a generic one, rip >> out of the pci root bus creation, so we could put the irq domain and >> pci domain etc.. in it. Finally, we could eliminate lots platform >> arch functions. I will post it out within one week. > > That's a completely orthogonal problem. From the MSI/interrupt > handling POV it does not matter at all where that information is > stored. All we care about is that it is retrievable via the (pci) > device which tries to setup MSI[X]. > > So we can store/retrieve it via generic functions into/from whatever > is available right now. If the irq side has generic interfaces to do > so then this wont conflict with your decisions to change the final > storage point because all it takes is to tweak the storage/retrieve > functions. > > So all we need at the moment is an agreed on way to store/retrieve > that information which is based on the current shared infrastructure, > aka. Linus tree. If we can utilize that you are completely free to > change the association mechanism underneath. Hi Thomas, thanks for your explanation. Now I got it, I will consider more about it. Thanks! Yijing. > > Thanks, > > tglx > > . > -- Thanks! Yijing -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
