Re: [PATCH] Fix build warnings in aer.h

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 10:31 PM, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 07/21/2014 07:38 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> [+cc Tuomas, Randy, Gavin, Gong, Lance, Tony]
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 04:08:44AM -0400, Mike Qiu wrote:
>>> build log:
>>>
>>> In file included from include/ras/ras_event.h:11:0,
>>>                  from drivers/ras/ras.c:13:
>>> include/linux/aer.h:42:129: warning: ‘struct pci_dev’
>>> declared inside parameter list [enabled by default]
>>>
>>> include/linux/aer.h:42:129: warning: its scope is only
>>> this definition or declaration, which is probably not
>>> what you want [enabled by default]
>>>
>>> include/linux/aer.h:46:130: warning: ‘struct pci_dev’
>>> declared inside parameter list [enabled by default]
>>>
>>> include/linux/aer.h:50:136: warning: ‘struct pci_dev’
>>> declared inside parameter list [enabled by default]
>>>
>>> include/linux/aer.h:57:14: warning: ‘struct pci_dev’
>>> declared inside parameter list [enabled by default]
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Mike Qiu <qiudayu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> OK, so the problem doesn't occur on x86 because there we have a struct
>> pci_dev declaration reached earlier via:
>>
>>   drivers/ras/ras.c
>>     include/ras/ras_event.h
>>       include/linux/edac.h
>>         include/linux/device.h
>>           include/linux/gfp.h
>>             arch/x86/include/asm/mmzone.h
>>               arch/x86/include/asm/mmzone_64.h
>>                 arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h
>>                   arch/x86/include/asm/mpspec.h
>>                     arch/x86/include/asm/x86_init.h
>>                       struct pci_dev;
>>       include/linux/aer.h
>>         ... pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting(struct pci_dev *dev);
>>
>> You're building powerpc, which doesn't have the same pci_dev
>> declaration in the arch header files, so you see the declaration
>> problem in aer.h.
>
> I get in on many i386 and x86_64 randconfig builds.... [checking]

Yeah, I should have said *an* x86 config doesn't see the problem.
There are lots of config variable involved in that path.

>> I could apply your fix, but it should go in v3.16 along with the commit
>> (0a2409aad38e ("trace, AER: Move trace into unified interface")) that
>> exposes the problem, and I'm leaving on vacation before I can get this
>> into -next, have it smoke-tested, and ask Linus to pull it.
>>
>> So you might want to ask Tony to put in his tree, since it looks like
>> he merged 0a2409aad38e in the first place.
>>
>> Please add these:
>>
>>   Fixes: 0a2409aad38e ("trace, AER: Move trace into unified interface")
>>   Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> I know 0a2409aad38e isn't actually *responsible* for the problem, but
>> anybody who backports 0a2409aad38e should pick up this fix as well.

Actually, since 0a2409aad38e is still in -next, the fix could be
merged first to avoid the bisection trap here.  But I don't know how
Tony feels about rebasing his branches.

Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux