Re: [Resend] pcibios_add_platform_entries usage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Wed, 23 Apr 2014, Michal Simek wrote:

> On 04/22/2014 10:26 AM, Sebastian Ott wrote:
> > On Sat, 19 Apr 2014, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> >> On Fri, 2014-04-18 at 12:10 +0200, Sebastian Ott wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 18 Apr 2014, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> >>>> On Thu, 2014-04-17 at 19:46 +0200, Sebastian Ott wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> pci: move open fabric devspec attribute to pci common code
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Move the devspec OF attribute to pci common code's set of device
> >>>>> attributes since it's not architecture dependent.
> >>>>> As a side effect microblaze and powerpc no longer need to use
> >>>>> pcibios_add_platform_entries.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.LFD.2.11.1404141101500.1529@denkbrett
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Ott <sebott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>
> >>>> Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>
> >>>> (Pending you've compile tested it on powerpc, I'm on vacation and
> >>>> haven't done it :)
> >>>
> >>> I did:
> >>> make ARCH=powerpc CROSS_COMPILE=powerpc64-4.3.2- g5_defconfig
> >>> make ARCH=powerpc CROSS_COMPILE=powerpc64-4.3.2-
> >>>
> >>> and failed with:
> >>>   CC      arch/powerpc/lib/xor_vmx.o
> >>> In file included from include/linux/list.h:4,
> >>>                  from include/linux/preempt.h:10,
> >>>                  from arch/powerpc/lib/xor_vmx.c:22:
> >>> include/linux/types.h:29: error: both ‘unsigned’ and ‘_Bool’ in declaration specifiers
> >>> cc1: warnings being treated as errors
> >>> include/linux/types.h:29: error: useless type name in empty declaration
> >>
> >> Not sure what's up here, did you try with a more recent compiler ? 4.3
> >> is pretty ancient by kernel standards.
> >>
> >> You can find cross compilers there:
> >>
> >> https://www.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/
> >>
> >> They aren't the newest either but they should work.
> > 
> > Yes. That did the trick.
> 
> Hope that you did the same for microblaze or just push the repo/branch with these
> patches to zero-day testing system and you got the results.

Yes, I compile-tested microblaze too.

Regards,
Sebastian
> 
> Thanks,
> Michal
> 
> 
> -- 
> Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng), OpenPGP -> KeyID: FE3D1F91
> w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854
> Maintainer of Linux kernel - Microblaze cpu - http://www.monstr.eu/fdt/
> Maintainer of Linux kernel - Xilinx Zynq ARM architecture
> Microblaze U-BOOT custodian and responsible for u-boot arm zynq platform
> 
> 
> 

[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux