Re: [PATCH pci-next 2/2] pci: remove dead code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Jan 2014 16:12:52 -0700
> Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> [+cc Jesse, Myron]
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Stephen Hemminger
>> <stephen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >
>> > My philosophy is unused code is dead code.
>> > And dead code is subject to bit rot and is likely source of bugs.
>> > Use it or lose it.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> This removes pci_enable_ido(), pci_enable_obff(), pci_enable_ltr(),
>> etc., which I think you added, Jesse.  In principle I like the idea of
>> removing code that isn't being used.  Of course, these might be used
>> by out-of-tree drivers, but I don't think we should go *too* far out
>> of our way to support them.
>>
>> Anybody have any objections to removing them?  Obviously they'll still
>> be in the git history, so it would be trivial to resurrect them.
>
> No objections.  If driver folks haven't yet found a use for them (and/or
> hw is scarce) there's no reason to keep these.

I split this up into separate patches because some of the code removed
is PCIe 3.0 support that people might have isses with, and so we can
CC: interested people and they can make sense out of it.  I'll post
the series as a v2 in a minute.

Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux