On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 10:30:17PM +0100, Bjørn Erik Nilsen wrote:
>
> 9. des. 2013 kl. 22:21 skrev Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> > On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Bjørn Erik Nilsen <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> Hi Bjorn,
> >>
> >> 9. des. 2013 kl. 21:43 skrev Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> >>
> >>> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 02:35:23PM +0100, Bjørn Erik Nilsen wrote:
> >>>> This patchset address Marek Vasut's comments on the previous
> >>>> patches. I decided to split into two separate commits as they are
> >>>> unrelated.
> >>>>
> >>>> Bjørn Erik Nilsen (2):
> >>>> PCI: designware: Fix crash in dw_msi_teardown_irq
> >>>> PCI: designware: Remove redundant call to pci_write_config
> >>>
> >>> Hi Bjørn,
> >>>
> >>> There's been a fair amount of discussion about the first patch, so I'm
> >>> ignoring these for now. Please repost these (again) when that all settles
> >>> down.
> >>
> >> I'm under the impression that all concerns have been addressed and that the discussion has settled down.
> >>
> >> What are the outstanding issues to be solved regarding these patches?
> >>
> >> I'm asking because these patches are acked-by Marek Vasut and Jingoo Han as well as tested-by Mohit Kumar (and obviously myself).
> >>
> >> Jingoo Han confirms he can reproduce the crash on Exynos and that the first patch fixes the problem.
> >
> > I didn't trace through the discussion closely enough to follow
> > complaints and their resolution or retraction. Can you post the
> > current version including the acks, just so I make sure I get the
> > latest stuff?
>
> I'm not able to repost right now, but I can do it tomorrow morning if needed.
>
> v5 (as posted) is the latest however, and the amendment is:
>
> Acked-by: Marek Vasut <marex@xxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Mohit Kumar <mohit.kumar@xxxxxx>
OK, I added these and applied to a pci/host-designware branch for v3.14. I
also added the following cleanup patch as suggested by Marek:
commit 0b8cfb6aa3aabc96177b1e68ef13d2eb5c686606
Author: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon Dec 9 15:11:25 2013 -0700
PCI: designware: Use typical "for" loop idiom
It's conventional to use "for" rather than "while" for simple iteration.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
index 5274085ecd4b..1c92833a4ed3 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
@@ -214,8 +214,7 @@ static void clear_irq_range(struct pcie_port *pp, unsigned int irq_base,
{
unsigned int i, res, bit, val;
- i = 0;
- while (i < nvec) {
+ for (i = 0; i < nvec; i++) {
irq_set_msi_desc_off(irq_base, i, NULL);
clear_bit(pos + i, pp->msi_irq_in_use);
/* Disable corresponding interrupt on MSI interrupt controller */
@@ -224,7 +223,6 @@ static void clear_irq_range(struct pcie_port *pp, unsigned int irq_base,
dw_pcie_rd_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + res, 4, &val);
val &= ~(1 << bit);
dw_pcie_wr_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + res, 4, val);
- ++i;
}
}
@@ -268,8 +266,7 @@ static int assign_irq(int no_irqs, struct msi_desc *desc, int *pos)
* descs are also successfully allocated.
*/
- i = 0;
- while (i < no_irqs) {
+ for (i = 0; i < no_irqs; i++) {
if (irq_set_msi_desc_off(irq, i, desc) != 0) {
clear_irq_range(pp, irq, i, pos0);
goto no_valid_irq;
@@ -281,7 +278,6 @@ static int assign_irq(int no_irqs, struct msi_desc *desc, int *pos)
dw_pcie_rd_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + res, 4, &val);
val |= 1 << bit;
dw_pcie_wr_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + res, 4, val);
- i++;
}
*pos = pos0;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
