On Thursday, November 28, 2013 12:39 AM, Bjørn Erik Nilsen wrote:
>
> Commit 904d0e7889933fb48d921c998fd1cabb3a9d6635 added
Please replace it with the following.
Commit 904d0e7889933fb48d921c998fd1cabb3a9d6635
"PCI: designware: Add irq_create_mapping()" added
Also, the subject of the commit is not good.
Usually, 'verb + objective + etc.' looks good.
Ex. PCI: designware: Remove irq_alloc_descs()
I tested this patch on Exynos platform; it works properly.
I will wait for v5 patch which addresses Marek Vasut's comments.
Thank you.
Best regards,
Jingoo Han
> irq_create_mapping which pre-allocates irq descs.
> Problem was that in assign_irq these descs were explicitly
> allocated and hence also freed, resulting in a crash.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bjørn Erik Nilsen <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
> index e33b68b..6c61abd 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
> @@ -242,11 +242,18 @@ static int assign_irq(int no_irqs, struct msi_desc *desc, int *pos)
> if (!irq)
> goto no_valid_irq;
>
> + /*
> + * irq_create_mapping (called from dw_pcie_host_init) pre-allocates
> + * descs so there is no need to allocate descs here. We can therefore
> + * assume that if irq_find_mapping above returns non-zero, then the
> + * descs are also successfully allocated. Hence no need to check the
> + * return value of irq_set_msi_desc_off below.
> + */
> +
> i = 0;
> while (i < no_irqs) {
> set_bit(pos0 + i, pp->msi_irq_in_use);
> - irq_alloc_descs((irq + i), (irq + i), 1, 0);
> - irq_set_msi_desc(irq + i, desc);
> + irq_set_msi_desc_off(irq, i, desc);
> /*Enable corresponding interrupt in MSI interrupt controller */
> res = ((pos0 + i) / 32) * 12;
> bit = (pos0 + i) % 32;
> @@ -266,7 +273,7 @@ no_valid_irq:
>
> static void clear_irq(unsigned int irq)
> {
> - int res, bit, val, pos;
> + int res, bit, val, pos, i, nvec;
> struct irq_desc *desc;
> struct msi_desc *msi;
> struct pcie_port *pp;
> @@ -281,18 +288,28 @@ static void clear_irq(unsigned int irq)
> return;
> }
>
> + /* undo what was done in assign_irq */
> pos = data->hwirq;
> + nvec = 1 << msi->msi_attrib.multiple;
>
> - irq_free_desc(irq);
> -
> - clear_bit(pos, pp->msi_irq_in_use);
> + i = 0;
> + while (i < nvec) {
> + clear_bit(pos + i, pp->msi_irq_in_use);
> + irq_set_msi_desc_off(irq, i, NULL);
> + /* Disable corresponding interrupt on MSI interrupt controller */
> + res = ((pos + i) / 32) * 12;
> + bit = (pos + i) % 32;
> + dw_pcie_rd_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + res, 4, &val);
> + val &= ~(1 << bit);
> + dw_pcie_wr_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + res, 4, val);
> + ++i;
> + }
>
> - /* Disable corresponding interrupt on MSI interrupt controller */
> - res = (pos / 32) * 12;
> - bit = pos % 32;
> - dw_pcie_rd_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + res, 4, &val);
> - val &= ~(1 << bit);
> - dw_pcie_wr_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + res, 4, val);
> + msi->msg.address_lo = 0;
> + msi->msg.address_hi = 0;
> + msi->msg.data = 0;
> + msi->irq = 0;
> + msi->msi_attrib.multiple = 0;
> }
>
> static int dw_msi_setup_irq(struct msi_chip *chip, struct pci_dev *pdev,
> @@ -320,12 +337,11 @@ static int dw_msi_setup_irq(struct msi_chip *chip, struct pci_dev *pdev,
> if (irq < 0)
> return irq;
>
> - msg_ctr &= ~PCI_MSI_FLAGS_QSIZE;
> - msg_ctr |= msgvec << 4;
> - pci_write_config_word(pdev, desc->msi_attrib.pos + PCI_MSI_FLAGS,
> - msg_ctr);
> + /*
> + * write_msi_msg() will update PCI_MSI_FLAGS so there
> + * is no need to explicitly call pci_write_config here
> + */
> desc->msi_attrib.multiple = msgvec;
> -
> msg.address_lo = virt_to_phys((void *)pp->msi_data);
> msg.address_hi = 0x0;
> msg.data = pos;
> --
> 1.8.4.4
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
