On 08/12/2013 11:44 AM, Jason Cooper wrote: > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:09:52AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: >> On 08/12/2013 10:37 AM, Jason Cooper wrote: >>> Thomas, >>> >>> Whole series applied as follows: >>> >>> +---+ mvebu/msi_pci (1-4,7) >>> | >>> +---+---+ mvebu/msi_irq (5,6) >>> | >>> +---+---+ mvebu/msi_mvebu (8-10) >>> >>> mvebu/msi_pci built successfully with Randy's config for x86_64. >>> >>> Thierry, I've tagged mvebu/msi_pci. Unless it all falls apart in -next, >>> those commit-id's won't change from what will be in arm-soc. >> >> So, the branch still isn't stable, hence I shouldn't use it as a >> baseline to apply Thierry's PCIe patches? > > It's as stable as I can make it. I've tested it for all known build > regressions (discovered in -next), and I see no reason to change it. > Anything needing fixed after today, I'll append the fix to it's HEAD if > appropriate. OK, if you will only append fixes rather than rebase the branch, then it's fine; what you said above implied that the commit IDs still might change. So, I'll try pulling this in with Thierry's patches today. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
