On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:52:01AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 08/12/2013 11:44 AM, Jason Cooper wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:09:52AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > >> On 08/12/2013 10:37 AM, Jason Cooper wrote: > >>> Thomas, > >>> > >>> Whole series applied as follows: > >>> > >>> +---+ mvebu/msi_pci (1-4,7) > >>> | > >>> +---+---+ mvebu/msi_irq (5,6) > >>> | > >>> +---+---+ mvebu/msi_mvebu (8-10) > >>> > >>> mvebu/msi_pci built successfully with Randy's config for x86_64. > >>> > >>> Thierry, I've tagged mvebu/msi_pci. Unless it all falls apart in -next, > >>> those commit-id's won't change from what will be in arm-soc. > >> > >> So, the branch still isn't stable, hence I shouldn't use it as a > >> baseline to apply Thierry's PCIe patches? > > > > It's as stable as I can make it. I've tested it for all known build > > regressions (discovered in -next), and I see no reason to change it. > > Anything needing fixed after today, I'll append the fix to it's HEAD if > > appropriate. > > OK, if you will only append fixes rather than rebase the branch, then > it's fine; what you said above implied that the commit IDs still might > change. Well, that's being generous. ;-) What I said was muddy as hell. Thanks for making me clear that up. > So, I'll try pulling this in with Thierry's patches today. Great! thx, Jason. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
