On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > That should not happen, because the only reason we're reassigning is > for IO space, and we shouldn't be touching the MEM assignments. I > agree that we should fix that. yes, that is https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2608461/ > > I do not agree that your current patches are the right way to fix > this. You are trying to make a relatively small patch that we can > wedge into v3.10 in a hurry. I would prefer that we work out a > cleaner solution that simplifies reassignment, *then* figure out the > best way to backport it as needed. ok, we can leave per root bus method to v3.11. we can put only one patch in v3.10. https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2608461/ PCI: Don't let mmio fallback to must-only, if ioport fails with must+optional that should fix the problem that Ben and Shan met. Thanks Yinghai -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
