On 04/19/2013 03:43 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote: > On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 1:53 AM, Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> From 0c45a7fca2276123d0b926a22ea69158dad8ab9c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 17:43:53 +0900 >> Subject: [PATCH 0/3] PCI: fix the object lifetime issue of parallel device removal on different pci hierarchy >> >> This patch is used to fix the panic issue of parallel device removal on different pci hierarchy, >> refer to https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54411. >> >> [ 418.775140] ioatdma i7core_edac edac_core sg e1000e igb dca ptp pps_core >> sd_mod crc_t10dif megaraid_sas mptsas mptscsih mptbase scsi_transport_sas >> scsi_mod >> [ 418.946462] CPU 4 >> [ 418.968377] Pid: 512, comm: kworker/u:2 Tainted: G W 3.8.0 #2 >> FUJITSU-SV PRIMEQUEST 1800E/SB >> [ 419.081763] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8137972e>] [<ffffffff8137972e>] >> pci_bus_read_config_word+0x5e/0x90 >> [ 419.189965] RSP: 0018:ffff8807b0a37c08 EFLAGS: 00010046 >> [ 419.253409] RAX: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b RBX: ffff8807bb4a1290 RCX: >> 0000000000000002 >> [ 419.338658] RDX: 00000000000000c4 RSI: 0000000000000008 RDI: >> ffff8807bb4a1290 >> [ 419.423925] RBP: ffff8807b0a37c48 R08: ffff8807b0a37c24 R09: >> 6db5c22da55960d0 >> [ 419.509175] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 000000000003ecd0 R12: >> ffff8807b0a37c66 >> [ 419.594425] R13: 0000000000000282 R14: ffffffff82126d40 R15: >> 0000000000000000 >> [ 419.679675] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8807c2200000(0000) >> knlGS:0000000000000000 >> [ 419.776343] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b >> [ 419.844981] CR2: 00007ffa898a54f8 CR3: 0000000001c0c000 CR4: >> 00000000000007e0 >> [ 419.930236] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: >> 0000000000000000 >> [ 420.015484] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: >> 0000000000000400 >> [ 420.100736] Process kworker/u:2 (pid: 512, threadinfo ffff8807b0a36000, task >> ffff8807b30bcd00) >> [ 420.203632] Stack: >> [ 420.227623] ffff8807000000c4 ffffffff00000008 ffffffff813851ef >> 0000000000992000 >> [ 420.316421] ffff8807b0a37c98 ffff8807bb49b3d8 0000000000000000 >> 0000000000000000 >> [ 420.405233] ffff8807b0a37c88 ffffffff8138044b ffff8807b0a37c88 >> 0000000000000246 >> [ 420.494137] Call Trace: >> [ 420.523326] [<ffffffff813851ef>] ? remove_callback+0x1f/0x40 >> [ 420.591984] [<ffffffff8138044b>] pci_pme_active+0x4b/0x1c0 >> [ 420.658545] [<ffffffff8137d8e7>] pci_stop_bus_device+0x57/0xb0 >> [ 420.729259] [<ffffffff8137dab6>] pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device+0x16/0x30 >> [ 420.811392] [<ffffffff813851fb>] remove_callback+0x2b/0x40 >> [ 420.877955] [<ffffffff81257a56>] sysfs_schedule_callback_work+0x26/0x70 >> [ 420.958017] [<ffffffff810919ae>] process_one_work+0x20e/0x5c0 >> [ 421.027691] [<ffffffff8109193f>] ? process_one_work+0x19f/0x5c0 >> [ 421.099441] [<ffffffff81257a30>] ? sysfs_schedule_callback+0x210/0x210 >> [ 421.178461] [<ffffffff81093a4e>] worker_thread+0x12e/0x370 >> [ 421.245020] [<ffffffff81093920>] ? manage_workers+0x180/0x180 >> [ 421.314697] [<ffffffff81099b8e>] kthread+0xee/0x100 >> [ 421.373992] [<ffffffff810e0f09>] ? __lock_release+0x129/0x190 >> [ 421.443671] [<ffffffff81099aa0>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x70/0x70 >> [ 421.518544] [<ffffffff816b2dac>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 >> [ 421.583031] [<ffffffff81099aa0>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x70/0x70 >> [ 421.657894] Code: 89 75 c8 c7 45 dc 00 00 00 00 e8 4e ef 32 00 49 89 c5 48 >> 8b 83 b8 00 00 00 4c 8d 45 dc b9 02 00 00 00 8b 55 c0 8b 75 c8 48 89 df <ff> 10 >> 8b 55 dc 4c 89 ee 48 c7 c7 c0 67 cb 81 89 45 c8 66 41 89 >> [ 421.890306] RIP [<ffffffff8137972e>] pci_bus_read_config_word+0x5e/0x90 >> [ 421.970475] RSP <ffff8807b0a37c08> >> [ 422.012121] ---[ end trace 403f76cf31f1bcb1 ]--- >> >> It is easy to reproduce with the following script: >> echo -n 1 > /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000\:10\:00.0/remove ; echo -n 1 > >> /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000\:1a\:01.0/remove >> >> The 1a:01.0 device is downstream from the 10:00.0 bridge. >> >> The sysfs interface remove_store() uses device_schedule_callback() to schedule >> the remove for later. What's happening is that we schedule >> remove_callback() for both devices before 10:00.0 has been removed, >> like this: >> >> # echo -n 1 > /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000\:10\:00.0/remove >> remove_store # for 10:00.0 >> device_schedule_callback(10:00.0, remove_callback) >> sysfs_schedule_callback >> kobject_get >> queue_work >> # echo -n 1 > /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000\:1a\:01.0/remove >> remove_store # for 1a:01.0 >> device_schedule_callback(1a:01.0, remove_callback) >> sysfs_schedule_callback >> kobject_get >> queue_work >> >> Later, we run the callbacks, starting with 10:00.0. This calls >> remove_callback() to perform the remove: >> >> remove_callback(10:00.0) >> mutex_lock(&pci_remove_rescan_mutex) >> pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device(pdev) >> mutex_unlock(&pci_remove_rescan_mutex) >> >> This will stop and remove the subtree below 10:00.0, but it does not >> actually free the pci_dev for 1a:01.0 because we increased its ref >> count in sysfs_schedule_callback. So after completing >> remove_callback(10:00.0), we run the second callback for 1a:01.0. >> >> But the PCI core did this removal wrong. It deallocated the struct pci_bus >> for bus 0000:1a too soon. >> >> So we take a reference on the bus object when capturing the struct pci_bus pointer, >> in order to keep it valid before its downstream devices' removal routines complete. >> >> Gu Zheng (3): >> PCI: take a reference on the bus object when we capture the struct >> pci_bus pointer >> PCI: rename alloc_pci_dev() to pci_alloc_dev() >> PCI: Move the acquiring the reference of pci bus inside >> pci_alloc_bus() >> >> arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_of_scan.c | 3 +-- >> drivers/char/agp/alpha-agp.c | 2 +- >> drivers/char/agp/parisc-agp.c | 2 +- >> drivers/pci/bus.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ >> drivers/pci/iov.c | 6 ++++-- >> drivers/pci/probe.c | 10 ++++++---- >> drivers/scsi/megaraid.c | 2 +- >> include/linux/pci.h | 5 ++++- >> 8 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > No. that is wrong. > > I can not find where that reference count get reduced! > in the my test patches that I sent, it does have have that in remove path. Hi Yinghai, Sorry for the later reply and the missing reading of your mail thread! > > What is reason for you to remove that line? It's just a mistake here. > > After put the line back, your test still can pass? Our test machine is not ready now, I'll test it soon. Maybe the result is the same as your patch, there are the same in the logic. In the original test of your patch, one doubt puzzles me, although we have increased the pci_bus' reference, but the pci_bus is still released too soon before its downstream devices' removal routines complete. Can you explain why? Is not there a reference detection mechanism in pci core when releasing the pci object? Thanks, Gu > > Yinghai -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
