[PATCH 0/3] PCI: fix the object lifetime issue of parallel device removal on different pci hierarchy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>From 0c45a7fca2276123d0b926a22ea69158dad8ab9c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 17:43:53 +0900
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] PCI: fix the object lifetime issue of parallel device removal on different pci hierarchy

This patch is used to fix the panic issue of parallel device removal on different pci hierarchy,
refer to https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54411.

[  418.775140]  ioatdma i7core_edac edac_core sg e1000e igb dca ptp pps_core
sd_mod crc_t10dif megaraid_sas mptsas mptscsih mptbase scsi_transport_sas
scsi_mod
[  418.946462] CPU 4 
[  418.968377] Pid: 512, comm: kworker/u:2 Tainted: G        W    3.8.0 #2
FUJITSU-SV PRIMEQUEST 1800E/SB
[  419.081763] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8137972e>]  [<ffffffff8137972e>]
pci_bus_read_config_word+0x5e/0x90
[  419.189965] RSP: 0018:ffff8807b0a37c08  EFLAGS: 00010046
[  419.253409] RAX: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b RBX: ffff8807bb4a1290 RCX:
0000000000000002
[  419.338658] RDX: 00000000000000c4 RSI: 0000000000000008 RDI:
ffff8807bb4a1290
[  419.423925] RBP: ffff8807b0a37c48 R08: ffff8807b0a37c24 R09:
6db5c22da55960d0
[  419.509175] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 000000000003ecd0 R12:
ffff8807b0a37c66
[  419.594425] R13: 0000000000000282 R14: ffffffff82126d40 R15:
0000000000000000
[  419.679675] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8807c2200000(0000)
knlGS:0000000000000000
[  419.776343] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
[  419.844981] CR2: 00007ffa898a54f8 CR3: 0000000001c0c000 CR4:
00000000000007e0
[  419.930236] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2:
0000000000000000
[  420.015484] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7:
0000000000000400
[  420.100736] Process kworker/u:2 (pid: 512, threadinfo ffff8807b0a36000, task
ffff8807b30bcd00)
[  420.203632] Stack:
[  420.227623]  ffff8807000000c4 ffffffff00000008 ffffffff813851ef
0000000000992000
[  420.316421]  ffff8807b0a37c98 ffff8807bb49b3d8 0000000000000000
0000000000000000
[  420.405233]  ffff8807b0a37c88 ffffffff8138044b ffff8807b0a37c88
0000000000000246
[  420.494137] Call Trace:
[  420.523326]  [<ffffffff813851ef>] ? remove_callback+0x1f/0x40
[  420.591984]  [<ffffffff8138044b>] pci_pme_active+0x4b/0x1c0
[  420.658545]  [<ffffffff8137d8e7>] pci_stop_bus_device+0x57/0xb0
[  420.729259]  [<ffffffff8137dab6>] pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device+0x16/0x30
[  420.811392]  [<ffffffff813851fb>] remove_callback+0x2b/0x40
[  420.877955]  [<ffffffff81257a56>] sysfs_schedule_callback_work+0x26/0x70
[  420.958017]  [<ffffffff810919ae>] process_one_work+0x20e/0x5c0
[  421.027691]  [<ffffffff8109193f>] ? process_one_work+0x19f/0x5c0
[  421.099441]  [<ffffffff81257a30>] ? sysfs_schedule_callback+0x210/0x210
[  421.178461]  [<ffffffff81093a4e>] worker_thread+0x12e/0x370
[  421.245020]  [<ffffffff81093920>] ? manage_workers+0x180/0x180
[  421.314697]  [<ffffffff81099b8e>] kthread+0xee/0x100
[  421.373992]  [<ffffffff810e0f09>] ? __lock_release+0x129/0x190
[  421.443671]  [<ffffffff81099aa0>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x70/0x70
[  421.518544]  [<ffffffff816b2dac>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
[  421.583031]  [<ffffffff81099aa0>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x70/0x70
[  421.657894] Code: 89 75 c8 c7 45 dc 00 00 00 00 e8 4e ef 32 00 49 89 c5 48
8b 83 b8 00 00 00 4c 8d 45 dc b9 02 00 00 00 8b 55 c0 8b 75 c8 48 89 df <ff> 10
8b 55 dc 4c 89 ee 48 c7 c7 c0 67 cb 81 89 45 c8 66 41 89 
[  421.890306] RIP  [<ffffffff8137972e>] pci_bus_read_config_word+0x5e/0x90
[  421.970475]  RSP <ffff8807b0a37c08>
[  422.012121] ---[ end trace 403f76cf31f1bcb1 ]---

It is easy to reproduce with the following script:
echo -n 1 > /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000\:10\:00.0/remove ; echo -n 1 >
/sys/bus/pci/devices/0000\:1a\:01.0/remove

The 1a:01.0 device is downstream from the 10:00.0 bridge. 

The sysfs interface remove_store() uses device_schedule_callback() to schedule
the remove for later. What's happening is that we schedule
remove_callback() for both devices before 10:00.0 has been removed,
like this:

    # echo -n 1 > /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000\:10\:00.0/remove
    remove_store  # for 10:00.0
      device_schedule_callback(10:00.0, remove_callback)
        sysfs_schedule_callback
          kobject_get
          queue_work
    # echo -n 1 >  /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000\:1a\:01.0/remove
    remove_store  # for 1a:01.0
      device_schedule_callback(1a:01.0, remove_callback)
        sysfs_schedule_callback
          kobject_get
          queue_work

Later, we run the callbacks, starting with 10:00.0.  This calls
remove_callback() to perform the remove:

    remove_callback(10:00.0)
      mutex_lock(&pci_remove_rescan_mutex)
      pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device(pdev)
      mutex_unlock(&pci_remove_rescan_mutex)

This will stop and remove the subtree below 10:00.0, but it does not
actually free the pci_dev for 1a:01.0 because we increased its ref
count in sysfs_schedule_callback.  So after completing
remove_callback(10:00.0), we run the second callback for 1a:01.0.

But the PCI core did this removal wrong. It deallocated the struct pci_bus
for bus 0000:1a too soon.

So we take a reference on the bus object when capturing the struct pci_bus pointer,
in order to keep it valid before its downstream devices' removal routines complete.  

Gu Zheng (3):
  PCI: take a reference on the bus object when we capture the struct
    pci_bus pointer
  PCI: rename alloc_pci_dev() to pci_alloc_dev()
  PCI: Move the acquiring the reference of pci bus inside
    pci_alloc_bus()

 arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_of_scan.c |    3 +--
 drivers/char/agp/alpha-agp.c      |    2 +-
 drivers/char/agp/parisc-agp.c     |    2 +-
 drivers/pci/bus.c                 |   14 ++++++++++++++
 drivers/pci/iov.c                 |    6 ++++--
 drivers/pci/probe.c               |   10 ++++++----
 drivers/scsi/megaraid.c           |    2 +-
 include/linux/pci.h               |    5 ++++-
 8 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux