On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 06:43:39AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 03:58:55PM +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> > So the patch eliminated the lockdep warning for mlx4 nested probing
> > sequence, but introduced lockdep warning for
> > 00:13.0 PIC: Intel Corporation 7500/5520/5500/X58 I/O Hub I/OxAPIC
> > Interrupt Controller (rev 22)
>
> Oops, the patch in itself doesn't really change anything. The caller
> should use a different subclass for the nested invocation, just like
> spin_lock_nested() and friends. Sorry about not being clear.
> Michael, can you please help?
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> tejun
So like this on top. Tejun, you didn't add your S.O.B and patch
description, if this helps as we expect they will be needed.
---->
pci: use work_on_cpu_nested for nested SRIOV
Snce 3.9-rc1 mlx driver started triggering a lockdep warning.
The issue is that a driver, in it's probe function, calls
pci_sriov_enable so a PF device probe causes VF probe (AKA nested
probe). Each probe in pci_device_probe which is (normally) run through
work_on_cpu (this is to get the right numa node for memory allocated by
the driver). In turn work_on_cpu does this internally:
schedule_work_on(cpu, &wfc.work);
flush_work(&wfc.work);
So if you are running probe on CPU1, and cause another
probe on the same CPU, this will try to flush
workqueue from inside same workqueue which triggers
a lockdep warning.
Nested probing might be tricky to get right generally.
But for pci_sriov_enable, the situation is actually very simple:
VFs almost never use the same driver as the PF so the warning
is bogus there.
This is hardly elegant as it might shut up some real warnings if a buggy
driver actually probes itself in a nested way, but looks to me like an
appropriate quick fix for 3.9.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
index 1fa1e48..9c836ef 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
@@ -286,9 +286,9 @@ static int pci_call_probe(struct pci_driver *drv, struct pci_dev *dev,
int cpu;
get_online_cpus();
- cpu = cpumask_any_and(cpumask_of_node(node), cpu_online_mask);
- if (cpu < nr_cpu_ids)
- error = work_on_cpu(cpu, local_pci_probe, &ddi);
+ cpu = cpumask_first_and(cpumask_of_node(node), cpu_online_mask);
+ if (cpu != raw_smp_processor_id() && cpu < nr_cpu_ids)
+ error = work_on_cpu_nested(cpu, local_pci_probe, &ddi);
else
error = local_pci_probe(&ddi);
put_online_cpus();
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
