Hey, On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 09:58:54PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > Hmm... how about adding a work_on_cpu_nested() which takes @subclass > > argument? Wouldn't that be much cleaner? > > > > Thanks. > > Is that 3.9 material though? Why wouldn't it be? It's actually safer as it doesn't change any logic. It's just updating lockdep annotation, which is what's needed here anyway. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
