On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Jason Gunthorpe > <jgunthorpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:07:00PM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >>> > So when I say set aside, I mean for instance, the PCI-E entry in DT >>> > has 128M of physical address space marked for PCI MMIO use. The kernel >>> > does PCI resource allocation and the HW decoders in each link will be >>> > set to claim some portion of the 128M - based on the MMIO windows >>> > programmed on the PCI-PCI root port bridges. The reamining part of the >>> > 128M is dead address space, not claimed by any hardware block at all. >>> >>> Thanks, this really helps get to the issue that the PCI core will care >>> about. The root ports look like normal bridges, so the core assumes >>> it can manage their windows as needed, as long as the windows stay >>> inside the host bridge apertures that are logically upstream from the >>> root ports. >> >> Yes, that is basically correct. This is what the PCI-E specification >> says the root complex/root port should look like and this is what some >> SOC hardware implements fully in hardware. The small wrinkle with >> Marvell is that the PCI-PCI bridge config space is created by the >> driver since the HW does not expose a standard config space. > > Oh, so the actual *root port* itself doesn't conform to the spec? > Wow, that's worse than I expected. > > Then I guess you have emulate it and make sure its config space is > complete enough and functional enough so that all the link management, > power management, AER, etc., code in the core works as well as it > would with a conforming device. I'm not sure the existing emulation in these patches is sufficient. For example, pci_sw_pci_bridge_write() updates bridge->membase when we write to the window register, but I don't see anything that updates the actual hardware decoder. That might be done in mvebu_pcie_window_config_port() via armada_370_xp_alloc_pcie_window(), but that looks like it's only done once. If the PCI core updates a root port window later, I don't see where the hardware decoder will be updated. Maybe you're counting on the window assignments to be static? The PCI core doesn't guarantee anything like that, though in the absence of hotplug I don't know any reason why it would change things. I also forgot about the bus number munging in mvebu_pcie_rd_conf(). The PCI core can update the bridge secondary/subordinate registers. It looks like you don't support writing to them, and the read path (pci_sw_pci_bridge_read()) looks like it doesn't do any translation between the hardware and Linux bus numbers. I don't understand the system well enough to know if this is an issue. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
