On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 12:13:21PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > pci_call_probe() uses work_on_cpu(), which creates and tears down a >> > full kthread on each call, to invoke ->probe() on node local CPU for >> > allocation affinity. >> > >> > The same goal can easily be achieved using a work item. This patch >> > rewrites pci_call_probe() so that it uses a work item instead of >> > work_on_cpu(). >> > >> > Note that the function is restructured for simplicity. This adds >> > get/put_online_cpus() pair for devices without node but the overhead >> > of doing so isn't anything material at this level. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> I applied this to my "next" branch and pushed it. Thanks! > > Can you please drop / revert this one? It seems we need work_on_cpu() > after all and I'm gonna reimplement it in sane way. I dropped it. Thanks for the heads-up. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html