On 06/03/2025 12:49, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 20/02/2025 10:42, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote: >> The 'reg' & 'reg-names' constraints used in the bindings and dtsi are >> different resulting in dt_bindings_check errors. Re-order the reg entries, > > Why? > >> fix the node names and move the nodes to maintain sort order to address the > > Fixing (how?) node name looks like separate problem. > > >> following errors/warnings. >> >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574-rdp449.dtb: pcie@20000000: reg-names:0: 'parf' was expected How can I reproduce this error? Isn't this error which you intentionally added and now you claim you fix? In the same patchset? This really looks like breaking things just to call it "look, I fixed something" two patches later in the same set. Best regards, Krzysztof
