On 20/02/2025 10:42, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote: > The 'reg' & 'reg-names' constraints used in the bindings and dtsi are > different resulting in dt_bindings_check errors. Re-order the reg entries, Why? > fix the node names and move the nodes to maintain sort order to address the Fixing (how?) node name looks like separate problem. > following errors/warnings. > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574-rdp449.dtb: pcie@20000000: reg-names:0: 'parf' was expected So this was added back in 2024 and never tested? > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi:1045.24-1127.5: Warning (simple_bus_reg): /soc@0/pcie@20000000: simple-bus unit address format error, expected "88000" > > Move the nodes to maintain sort order w.r.t address. > I don't understand this commit msg and huge diff does not help. It's very difficult to spot the actual changes and since Qualcomm was never testing this in the past, I do not believe it is being tested now. Clearly explain what is the problem - *each of them*. Best regards, Krzysztof
