Re: [PATCH v6 3/4] PCI: dwc: Improve handling of PCIe lane configuration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 01:00:02PM +0530, Krishna Chaitanya Chundru wrote:
> Currently even if the number of lanes hardware supports is equal to
> the number lanes provided in the devicetree, the driver is trying to
> configure again the maximum number of lanes which is not needed.
> 
> Update number of lanes only when it is not equal to hardware capability.
> 
> And also if the num-lanes property is not present in the devicetree
> update the num_lanes with the maximum hardware supports.
> 
> Introduce dw_pcie_link_get_max_link_width() to get the maximum lane
> width the hardware supports.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Krishna Chaitanya Chundru <krishna.chundru@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c |  3 +++
>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c      | 11 ++++++++++-
>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h      |  1 +
>  3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> index ffaded8f2df7..dd56cc02f4ef 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> @@ -504,6 +504,9 @@ int dw_pcie_host_init(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp)
>  
>  	dw_pcie_iatu_detect(pci);
>  
> +	if (pci->num_lanes < 1)
> +		pci->num_lanes = dw_pcie_link_get_max_link_width(pci);
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * Allocate the resource for MSG TLP before programming the iATU
>  	 * outbound window in dw_pcie_setup_rc(). Since the allocation depends
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
> index 145e7f579072..967c62cf3db0 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
> @@ -737,12 +737,21 @@ static void dw_pcie_link_set_max_speed(struct dw_pcie *pci)
>  
>  }
>  
> +int dw_pcie_link_get_max_link_width(struct dw_pcie *pci)
> +{
> +	u8 cap = dw_pcie_find_capability(pci, PCI_CAP_ID_EXP);
> +	u32 lnkcap = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, cap + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP);
> +
> +	return FIELD_GET(PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_MLW, lnkcap);
> +}
> +
>  static void dw_pcie_link_set_max_link_width(struct dw_pcie *pci, u32 num_lanes)
>  {
> +	int max_lanes = dw_pcie_link_get_max_link_width(pci);
>  	u32 lnkcap, lwsc, plc;
>  	u8 cap;
>  
> -	if (!num_lanes)
> +	if (!num_lanes || max_lanes == num_lanes)

Is the first condition still valid?

- Mani

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்




[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux