On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 1:26 AM Karolina Stolarek <karolina.stolarek@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > As for the commit message, I'd drop the before-after dmesg messages and > explain that the information presented by aer_print_port_info() can be > easily inferred from the actual error messages. I had to read the code > to remind myself what information is duplicated. Any objection to doing both (i.e. dmesg + explicitly call out fields)? An ex. of duplicated log was requested in an earlier version (internal review). Thanks, Jon
