Hello,
> In response to v2, Ilpo gave a heads-up that the first patch in the series
> was problematic: A zero Max Link Speed is common in particular on Root
> Complex Integrated Endpoints, so there's no reason to emit a warning
> or assume 2.5 GT/s.
>
> In the interest of resolving the regression before the holidays,
> I'm respinning already after two days and I'm reverting back to my
> original proposal to use 0 as lowest bit in the GENMASK() macro.
> I've amended the commit message with an explanation to address Ilpo's
> concern that the 0 may cause confusion because Supported Link Speeds
> ends at bit 1.
Applied to for-linus, thank you!
[01/02] PCI: Honor Max Link Speed when determining supported speeds
https://git.kernel.org/pci/pci/c/bec4e3709ada
[02/02] PCI/bwctrl: Enable only if more than one speed is supported
https://git.kernel.org/pci/pci/c/117a857baee7
Krzysztof
