On Thu, 12 Dec 2024, Ilpo Järvinen wrote: > On Wed, 11 Dec 2024, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > > On Fri, 13 Sep 2024 17:36:30 +0300 > > Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > pcie_read_tlp_log() handles only 4 Header Log DWORDs but TLP Prefix Log > > > (PCIe r6.1 secs 7.8.4.12 & 7.9.14.13) may also be present. > > > > > > Generalize pcie_read_tlp_log() and struct pcie_tlp_log to handle also > > > TLP Prefix Log. The relevant registers are formatted identically in AER > > > and DPC Capability, but has these variations: > > > > > > a) The offsets of TLP Prefix Log registers vary. > > > b) DPC RP PIO TLP Prefix Log register can be < 4 DWORDs. > > > > > > Therefore callers must pass the offset of the TLP Prefix Log register > > > and the entire length to pcie_read_tlp_log() to be able to read the > > > correct number of TLP Prefix DWORDs from the correct offset. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Trivial comments below > > Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Would have been nice if they'd just made the formats have the > > same sized holes etc! > > That's not even the worst problem. > > They managed to copy-paste most of the stuff into DPC (copy-paste is > really obvious because the text still refers to AER in a DPC section :-)) > but forgot to add a few capability fields into the DPC capability, most > importantly, the bit that indicates whether TLP was logged in Flit mode > or not And now we get to keep the pieces how to interpret the Log > Registers (relates to the follow up series). :-( > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/tlp.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/tlp.c > > > index 65ac7b5d8a87..def9dd7b73e8 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/tlp.c > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/tlp.c > > > @@ -11,26 +11,65 @@ > > > > > /** > > > * pcie_read_tlp_log - read TLP Header Log > > Maybe update this to read TLP Header and Prefix Logs > > > * @dev: PCIe device > > > * @where: PCI Config offset of TLP Header Log > > > + * @where2: PCI Config offset of TLP Prefix Log > > > > Is it worth giving it a more specific name than where2? > > Possibly renaming where as well! > > Sure, why not. Hi again, After doing this rename, I rebased the Flit mode series on top of it and realized there's one small problem with naming where2. It will be overloaded between TLP Prefix Log (Non-Flit mode) and extended TLP Header Log (DW5+) (Flit mode) so I'm not sure if there's really going to be a good name for it. -- i.