On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 08:31:38PM +0530, Krishna chaitanya chundru wrote:
> QPS615 is the PCIe switch which has one upstream and three downstream
> ports. To one of the downstream ports ethernet MAC is connected as endpoint
> device. Other two downstream ports are supposed to connect to external
> device. One Host can connect to QPS615 by upstream port. QPS615 switch
> needs to be configured after powering on and before PCIe link was up.
s/is the/is a/
> The PCIe controller driver already enables link training at the host side
> even before qps615 driver probe happens, due to this when driver enables
> power to the switch it participates in the link training and PCIe link
> may come up before configuring the switch through i2c. To prevent the
> host from participating in link training, disable link training on the
> host side to ensure the link does not come up before the switch is
> configured via I2C.
>
> Based up on dt property and type of the port, qps615 is configured
> through i2c.
> +config PCI_PWRCTL_QPS615
> + tristate "PCI Power Control driver for QPS615"
> + select PCI_PWRCTL
> + help
> + Say Y here to enable the pwrctl driver for Qualcomm
> + QPS615 PCIe switch which enables and configures it
> + through i2c.
Does this work if build as a module? I guess maybe the QPS615 doesn't
even get powered on without this, so it would be configured and then
powered on after module-load time?
s/pwrctl/pwrctrl/ (also in filename, code, variables, etc below)
Will need to be rebased to account for the pwrctl -> pwrctrl rename in
v6.13-rc1.
> +static int qps615_pwrctl_power_on(struct qps615_pwrctl_ctx *ctx)
> +{
> + struct qps615_pwrctl_cfg *cfg;
> + int ret, i;
> +
> + ret = regulator_bulk_enable(ARRAY_SIZE(ctx->supplies), ctx->supplies);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return dev_err_probe(ctx->pwrctl.dev, ret, "cannot enable regulators\n");
> +
> + gpiod_set_value(ctx->reset_gpio, 0);
> +
> + /* wait for the internal osc frequency to stablise */
s/stablise/stabilise/
> + usleep_range(10000, 10500);
> +
> + ret = qps615_pwrctl_assert_deassert_reset(ctx, false);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out;
> +
> + if (ctx->cfg[QPS615_USP].axi_freq_125) {
> + ret = qps615_pwrctl_i2c_write(ctx->client, QPS615_BUS_CONTROL, BIT(16));
> + if (ret)
> + dev_err(ctx->pwrctl.dev, "Setting AXI clk freq failed %d\n", ret);
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < QPS615_MAX; i++) {
> + cfg = &ctx->cfg[i];
> + if (cfg->disable_port) {
> + ret = qps615_pwrctl_disable_port(ctx, i);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(ctx->pwrctl.dev, "Disabling port failed\n");
> + goto out;
> + }
> + }
A helper function could remove a level of indentation for the body of
this loop.
> +static int qps615_pwrctl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + struct pci_host_bridge *bridge;
> + enum qps615_pwrctl_ports port;
> + struct qps615_pwrctl_ctx *ctx;
> + int ret, addr;
> +
> + bridge = pci_find_host_bridge(to_pci_dev(dev->parent)->bus);
Move to where "bridge" is used.
> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, ctx);
Can this be moved to the point where we know we won't return an error?
Bjorn
