On 10/12/24 21:16, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 05:55:25PM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>> On 10/10/24 19:35, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
>>>> +static void rockchip_pcie_ep_link_training(struct work_struct *work)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct rockchip_pcie_ep *ep =
>>>> + container_of(work, struct rockchip_pcie_ep, link_training.work);
>>>> + struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip = &ep->rockchip;
>>>> + struct device *dev = rockchip->dev;
>>>> + u32 val;
>>>> + int ret;
>>>> +
>>>> + /* Enable Gen1 training and wait for its completion */
>>>> + ret = readl_poll_timeout(rockchip->apb_base + PCIE_CORE_CTRL,
>>>> + val, PCIE_LINK_TRAINING_DONE(val), 50,
>>>> + LINK_TRAIN_TIMEOUT);
>>>> + if (ret)
>>>> + goto again;
>>>> +
>>>> + /* Make sure that the link is up */
>>>> + ret = readl_poll_timeout(rockchip->apb_base + PCIE_CLIENT_BASIC_STATUS1,
>>>> + val, PCIE_LINK_UP(val), 50,
>>>> + LINK_TRAIN_TIMEOUT);
>>>> + if (ret)
>>>> + goto again;
>>>> +
>>>> + /* Check the current speed */
>>>> + val = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_CORE_CTRL);
>>>> + if (!PCIE_LINK_IS_GEN2(val) && rockchip->link_gen == 2) {
>>>
>>> PCIE_LINK_IS_GEN2()?
>>
>> This is defined in drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h. What is it exactly
>> you would like to know about this ?
>>
>
> !PCIE_LINK_IS_GEN2 means check is for non-Gen2 mode, isn't it? I guess the check
> should be 'if (PCIE_LINK_IS_GEN2...)
Nope, the negative test is correct. The condition means: if we are not at GEN2
speed yet AND gen2 was requested, then initiate training again to get gen2.
So !PCIE_LINK_IS_GEN2() is correct.
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
