Abdul Rahim <abdul.rahim@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 11:41:52AM GMT, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 06:15:18PM +0530, Abdul Rahim wrote: >> > Fixed spelling and edited for clarity. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Abdul Rahim <abdul.rahim@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> > --- >> > Documentation/PCI/pci.rst | 2 +- >> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> > >> > diff --git a/Documentation/PCI/pci.rst b/Documentation/PCI/pci.rst >> > index dd7b1c0c21da..344c2c2d94f9 100644 >> > --- a/Documentation/PCI/pci.rst >> > +++ b/Documentation/PCI/pci.rst >> > @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ driver generally needs to perform the following initialization: >> > - Enable DMA/processing engines >> > >> > When done using the device, and perhaps the module needs to be unloaded, >> > -the driver needs to take the follow steps: >> > +the driver needs to perform the following steps: >> >> I don't see a spelling fix here, and personally I wouldn't bother with >> changing "take" to "perform" unless we have other more significant >> changes to make at the same time. > > - "follow" has been corrected to "following", which is more appriopriate > in this context. > - I know its trivial, but can disturb the readers flow > - do you want me to change the message to "Edited for clarity" The problem is not s/follow/following/, it is the other, unrelated change you made that does not improve the text. There are reasons why we ask people not to mix multiple changes. If you submit just the "following" fix, it will surely be applied. Thanks, jon
