On 23/07/2024 23:03, Jim Quinlan wrote: > On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 2:53 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On 16/07/2024 23:31, Jim Quinlan wrote: >>> This adds the description for the 7712 SoC, a Broadcom >>> STB sibling chip of the RPi 5. Two new reset controllers >>> are described. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> .../bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml | 26 +++++++++++++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml >>> index 692f7ed7c98e..90683a0df2c5 100644 >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml >>> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ properties: >>> - brcm,bcm7425-pcie # Broadcom 7425 MIPs >>> - brcm,bcm7435-pcie # Broadcom 7435 MIPs >>> - brcm,bcm7445-pcie # Broadcom 7445 Arm >>> + - brcm,bcm7712-pcie # Broadcom STB sibling of Rpi 5 >>> >>> reg: >>> maxItems: 1 >>> @@ -100,12 +101,16 @@ properties: >>> items: >>> - description: reset for external PCIe PERST# signal # perst >>> - description: reset for phy reset calibration # rescal >>> + - description: reset for PCIe/CPU bus bridge # bridge >>> + - description: reset for soft PCIe core reset # swinit >>> >>> reset-names: >>> minItems: 1 >>> items: >>> - const: perst >>> - const: rescal >>> + - const: bridge >>> + - const: swinit >> >> This does not match at all what you have in allOf:if:then section. >> >>> >>> required: >>> - compatible >>> @@ -159,6 +164,27 @@ allOf: >>> - resets >>> - reset-names >>> >>> + - if: >>> + properties: >>> + compatible: >>> + contains: >>> + const: brcm,bcm7712-pcie >>> + then: >>> + properties: >>> + resets: >>> + minItems: 3 >>> + maxItems: 3 >>> + >>> + reset-names: >>> + items: >>> + - const: rescal >> >> Look - here it is rescal. Before you said it must be perst. >> >> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.8/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml#L132 > > Hello Krzysztof, > > The difference between my commits and the above example is that the > above example has no "desc" line(s) to describe the clocks -- How Which does not really matter to illustrate the concept where you define the widest constraints and where you narrow them. > would you add this? Or are you okay with (a) no description or (b) > using a "#comment..." next to the clock's name? Best regards, Krzysztof
