Dave Jiang wrote: > Per CXL spec r3.1 8.1.5.2, secondary bus reset is masked unless the > "Unmask SBR" bit is set. Add a check to the PCI secondary bus reset > path to fail the CXL SBR request if the "Unmask SBR" bit is clear in > the CXL Port Control Extensions register by returning -ENOTTY. > > With the current behavior, the bus_reset would appear to have executed > successfully, however the operation is actually masked if the "Unmask > SBR" bit is set with the default value. The intention is to inform the > user that SBR for the CXL device is masked and will not go through. > > The expectation is that if a user overrides the "Unmask SBR" via a > user tool such as setpci then they can trigger a bus reset successfully. > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/20240220203956.GA1502351@bhelgaas/ > Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@xxxxxxxxx> > --- [..] > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c > index e5f243dd4288..259e5d6538bb 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c > @@ -4927,10 +4927,55 @@ static int pci_dev_reset_slot_function(struct pci_dev *dev, bool probe) > return pci_reset_hotplug_slot(dev->slot->hotplug, probe); > } > > +static bool pci_is_cxl(struct pci_dev *dev) > +{ > + return pci_find_dvsec_capability(dev, PCI_DVSEC_VENDOR_ID_CXL, > + CXL_DVSEC_PCIE_DEVICE); > +} > + > +static bool is_cxl_port_sbr_masked(struct pci_dev *dev) > +{ > + int dvsec; > + u16 reg; > + int rc; > + > + /* > + * No DVSEC found, must not be CXL port. > + */ This comment is unfortunately not correct. Per CXL 9.12.3 "Enumerating CXL RPs and DSPs", the CXL_DVSEC_PCIE_PORT disappears when no endpoint is connected. So the comment should be: /* * No DVSEC found, either is not a CXL port, or not connected in which * case mask state is a nop (CXL 3.1 9.12.3 "Enumerating CXL RPs and DSPs") */ > + dvsec = pci_find_dvsec_capability(dev, PCI_DVSEC_VENDOR_ID_CXL, > + CXL_DVSEC_PCIE_PORT); > + if (!dvsec) > + return false; > + > + rc = pci_read_config_word(dev, dvsec + CXL_DVSEC_PORT_CONTROL, ®); > + if (rc) > + return true; If the link gets disconnected after the above check but before reading the register the value returned *should* be 0xffff which should naturally indicate that reset is not masked.