Re: [PATCH v10 01/14] PCI: imx6: Simplify clock handling by using clk_bulk*() function

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 10:58:01AM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 04:31:22PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 12:33:22PM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
> > > Refector the clock handling logic. Add 'clk_names' define in drvdata. Use
> > > clk_bulk*() api simplify the code.
> > > 
> > > Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@xxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > 
> > > Notes:
> > >     Change from v9 to v10
> > >     - fixed missed delete a case, which need failthrough to next one.
> > >     Change from v8 to v9
> > >     - change clks names
> > >     - Add Manivannan's review tag
> > >     
> > >     Change from v7 to v8
> > >     - update comment message
> > >     - using ARRAY_SIZE to count clk_names.
> > >     Change from v6 to v7
> > >     - none
> > >     Change from v4 to v5
> > >     - update commit message
> > >     - direct using clk name list, instead of macro
> > >     - still keep caculate clk list count because sizeof return pre allocated
> > >     array size.
> > >     
> > >     Change from v3 to v4
> > >     - using clk_bulk_*() API
> > >     Change from v1 to v3
> > >     - none
> > >     
> > >     Change from v4 to v5
> > >     - update commit message
> > >     - direct using clk name list, instead of macro
> > >     - still keep caculate clk list count because sizeof return pre allocated
> > >     array size.
> > >     
> > >     Change from v3 to v4
> > >     - using clk_bulk_*() API
> > >     Change from v1 to v3
> > >     - none
> > >     
> > >     Change from v8 to v9
> > >     - change clks names
> > >     - Add Manivannan's review tag
> > >     
> > >     Change from v7 to v8
> > >     - update comment message
> > >     - using ARRAY_SIZE to count clk_names.
> > >     Change from v6 to v7
> > >     - none
> > >     Change from v4 to v5
> > >     - update commit message
> > >     - direct using clk name list, instead of macro
> > >     - still keep caculate clk list count because sizeof return pre allocated
> > >     array size.
> > >     
> > >     Change from v3 to v4
> > >     - using clk_bulk_*() API
> > >     Change from v1 to v3
> > >     - none
> > >     
> > >     Change from v4 to v5
> > >     - update commit message
> > >     - direct using clk name list, instead of macro
> > >     - still keep caculate clk list count because sizeof return pre allocated
> > >     array size.
> > >     
> > >     Change from v3 to v4
> > >     - using clk_bulk_*() API
> > >     Change from v1 to v3
> > >     - none
> > > 
> > >  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c | 138 ++++++++++----------------
> > >  1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 88 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> > > index 74703362aeec7..82854e94c5621 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> > > @@ -61,12 +61,16 @@ enum imx6_pcie_variants {
> > >  #define IMX6_PCIE_FLAG_IMX6_SPEED_CHANGE	BIT(1)
> > >  #define IMX6_PCIE_FLAG_SUPPORTS_SUSPEND		BIT(2)
> > >  
> > > +#define IMX6_PCIE_MAX_CLKS       6
> > > +
> > >  struct imx6_pcie_drvdata {
> > >  	enum imx6_pcie_variants variant;
> > >  	enum dw_pcie_device_mode mode;
> > >  	u32 flags;
> > >  	int dbi_length;
> > >  	const char *gpr;
> > > +	const char * const *clk_names;
> > > +	const u32 clks_cnt;
> > >  };
> > >  
> > >  struct imx6_pcie {
> > > @@ -74,11 +78,7 @@ struct imx6_pcie {
> > >  	int			reset_gpio;
> > >  	bool			gpio_active_high;
> > >  	bool			link_is_up;
> > > -	struct clk		*pcie_bus;
> > > -	struct clk		*pcie_phy;
> > > -	struct clk		*pcie_inbound_axi;
> > > -	struct clk		*pcie;
> > > -	struct clk		*pcie_aux;
> > > +	struct clk_bulk_data	clks[IMX6_PCIE_MAX_CLKS];
> > 
> > Why can't you allocate this dynamically ?
> 
> Engineer choose. clk_bulk_data is small data struct, two pointers (16byte
> in 64bit system). clks in imx is 3-4, Over half already used(compared 6).
> waste case only wast 48byte.
>  
> Dynamically allocate can't save much memory, there are some extra manage
> meta data for dynamical memory, which may bigger than 48byte.
> 
> Frank
> 
> > 
> > >  	struct regmap		*iomuxc_gpr;
> > >  	u16			msi_ctrl;
> > >  	u32			controller_id;
> > > @@ -407,13 +407,18 @@ static void imx7d_pcie_wait_for_phy_pll_lock(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie)
> > >  
> > >  static int imx6_setup_phy_mpll(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie)
> > >  {
> > > -	unsigned long phy_rate = clk_get_rate(imx6_pcie->pcie_phy);
> > > +	unsigned long phy_rate = 0;
> > >  	int mult, div;
> > >  	u16 val;
> > > +	int i;
> > >  
> > >  	if (!(imx6_pcie->drvdata->flags & IMX6_PCIE_FLAG_IMX6_PHY))
> > >  		return 0;
> > >  
> > > +	for (i = 0; i < imx6_pcie->drvdata->clks_cnt; i++)
> > > +		if (strncmp(imx6_pcie->clks[i].id, "pcie_phy", 8) == 0)
> > > +			phy_rate = clk_get_rate(imx6_pcie->clks[i].clk);
> > > +
> > >  	switch (phy_rate) {
> > >  	case 125000000:
> > >  		/*
> > > @@ -550,19 +555,11 @@ static int imx6_pcie_attach_pd(struct device *dev)
> > >  
> > >  static int imx6_pcie_enable_ref_clk(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie)
> > >  {
> > > -	struct dw_pcie *pci = imx6_pcie->pci;
> > > -	struct device *dev = pci->dev;
> > >  	unsigned int offset;
> > >  	int ret = 0;
> > >  
> > >  	switch (imx6_pcie->drvdata->variant) {
> > >  	case IMX6SX:
> > > -		ret = clk_prepare_enable(imx6_pcie->pcie_inbound_axi);
> > > -		if (ret) {
> > > -			dev_err(dev, "unable to enable pcie_axi clock\n");
> > > -			break;
> > > -		}
> > > -
> > >  		regmap_update_bits(imx6_pcie->iomuxc_gpr, IOMUXC_GPR12,
> > >  				   IMX6SX_GPR12_PCIE_TEST_POWERDOWN, 0);
> > >  		break;
> > > @@ -589,12 +586,6 @@ static int imx6_pcie_enable_ref_clk(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie)
> > >  	case IMX8MQ_EP:
> > >  	case IMX8MP:
> > >  	case IMX8MP_EP:
> > > -		ret = clk_prepare_enable(imx6_pcie->pcie_aux);
> > > -		if (ret) {
> > > -			dev_err(dev, "unable to enable pcie_aux clock\n");
> > > -			break;
> > > -		}
> > > -
> > >  		offset = imx6_pcie_grp_offset(imx6_pcie);
> > >  		/*
> > >  		 * Set the over ride low and enabled
> > > @@ -615,9 +606,6 @@ static int imx6_pcie_enable_ref_clk(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie)
> > >  static void imx6_pcie_disable_ref_clk(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie)
> > >  {
> > >  	switch (imx6_pcie->drvdata->variant) {
> > > -	case IMX6SX:
> > > -		clk_disable_unprepare(imx6_pcie->pcie_inbound_axi);
> > > -		break;
> > >  	case IMX6QP:
> > >  	case IMX6Q:
> > >  		regmap_update_bits(imx6_pcie->iomuxc_gpr, IOMUXC_GPR1,
> > > @@ -631,14 +619,6 @@ static void imx6_pcie_disable_ref_clk(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie)
> > >  				   IMX7D_GPR12_PCIE_PHY_REFCLK_SEL,
> > >  				   IMX7D_GPR12_PCIE_PHY_REFCLK_SEL);
> > >  		break;
> > > -	case IMX8MM:
> > > -	case IMX8MM_EP:
> > > -	case IMX8MQ:
> > > -	case IMX8MQ_EP:
> > > -	case IMX8MP:
> > > -	case IMX8MP_EP:
> > > -		clk_disable_unprepare(imx6_pcie->pcie_aux);
> > > -		break;
> > >  	default:
> > >  		break;
> > >  	}
> > > @@ -650,23 +630,9 @@ static int imx6_pcie_clk_enable(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie)
> > >  	struct device *dev = pci->dev;
> > >  	int ret;
> > >  
> > > -	ret = clk_prepare_enable(imx6_pcie->pcie_phy);
> > > -	if (ret) {
> > > -		dev_err(dev, "unable to enable pcie_phy clock\n");
> > > +	ret = clk_bulk_prepare_enable(imx6_pcie->drvdata->clks_cnt, imx6_pcie->clks);
> > > +	if (ret)
> > >  		return ret;
> > > -	}
> > > -
> > > -	ret = clk_prepare_enable(imx6_pcie->pcie_bus);
> > > -	if (ret) {
> > > -		dev_err(dev, "unable to enable pcie_bus clock\n");
> > > -		goto err_pcie_bus;
> > > -	}
> > > -
> > > -	ret = clk_prepare_enable(imx6_pcie->pcie);
> > > -	if (ret) {
> > > -		dev_err(dev, "unable to enable pcie clock\n");
> > > -		goto err_pcie;
> > > -	}
> > >  
> > >  	ret = imx6_pcie_enable_ref_clk(imx6_pcie);
> > >  	if (ret) {
> > > @@ -679,11 +645,7 @@ static int imx6_pcie_clk_enable(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie)
> > >  	return 0;
> > >  
> > >  err_ref_clk:
> > > -	clk_disable_unprepare(imx6_pcie->pcie);
> > > -err_pcie:
> > > -	clk_disable_unprepare(imx6_pcie->pcie_bus);
> > > -err_pcie_bus:
> > > -	clk_disable_unprepare(imx6_pcie->pcie_phy);
> > > +	clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(imx6_pcie->drvdata->clks_cnt, imx6_pcie->clks);
> > >  
> > >  	return ret;
> > >  }
> > > @@ -691,9 +653,7 @@ static int imx6_pcie_clk_enable(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie)
> > >  static void imx6_pcie_clk_disable(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie)
> > >  {
> > >  	imx6_pcie_disable_ref_clk(imx6_pcie);
> > > -	clk_disable_unprepare(imx6_pcie->pcie);
> > > -	clk_disable_unprepare(imx6_pcie->pcie_bus);
> > > -	clk_disable_unprepare(imx6_pcie->pcie_phy);
> > > +	clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(imx6_pcie->drvdata->clks_cnt, imx6_pcie->clks);
> > >  }
> > >  
> > >  static void imx6_pcie_assert_core_reset(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie)
> > > @@ -1252,6 +1212,7 @@ static int imx6_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > >  	struct device_node *node = dev->of_node;
> > >  	int ret;
> > >  	u16 val;
> > > +	int i;
> > >  
> > >  	imx6_pcie = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*imx6_pcie), GFP_KERNEL);
> > >  	if (!imx6_pcie)
> > > @@ -1305,32 +1266,20 @@ static int imx6_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > >  		return imx6_pcie->reset_gpio;
> > >  	}
> > >  
> > > -	/* Fetch clocks */
> > > -	imx6_pcie->pcie_bus = devm_clk_get(dev, "pcie_bus");
> > > -	if (IS_ERR(imx6_pcie->pcie_bus))
> > > -		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(imx6_pcie->pcie_bus),
> > > -				     "pcie_bus clock source missing or invalid\n");
> > > +	if (imx6_pcie->drvdata->clks_cnt >= IMX6_PCIE_MAX_CLKS)
> > > +		return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENOMEM, "clks_cnt is too big\n");
> > 
> > Same question as above, this should not fail if the clks array is
> > dynamically allocated according to imx6_pcie->drvdata->clks_cnt.
> 
> Devm_kzalloc also may return NULL. Still need check. This safe check only
> meanful when add new platform. imx6_pcie->drvdata->clks_cnt is static data.
> 
> It should never failure at running time. But, devm_kzalloc may failure
> at run time.
> 
> It is not big deal. It's most likely personal tast. For small static data,
> I perfer use static memory.

It is fine to keep the static data (but meanful, tast and perfer aren't
English words, a spell checker would fix them, if I may suggest).

Thanks,
Lorenzo




[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux