On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> The notes about "-v2, -v3, -v4, etc." are not really useful in the >>> commit changelogs. They're helpful in the [00/] message, but not in >>> the changelogs. >> >> But Jesse may still need mark to figure out which one is latest? > > The way I do that is with "stg mail -v v3", which puts "[PATCH v3 > 01/10]" in the subject. IMO, that's much more useful because when you > post a 23-patch series, I don't want to be bothered with v1, v2, v3 on > a per-patch basis. For that, I could just sed to replace PATCH to PATCH v3 > > It's true that when you post v2, many of those 23 patches will be > unchanged from v1, and you do have to describe that in the [v2 00/23] > mail. But at least it's easy to identify the entire set of v2 > patches. Version number of the entire set could be different from individual patch. That could be more confusing. Yinghai -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
