On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 04:12:24PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 08:02:40PM +0200, Niklas Schnelle wrote: > > On Mon, 2023-07-03 at 12:42 -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 03:52:53PM +0200, Niklas Schnelle wrote: > > > > Hi Bjorn, > > > > > > > > This is a follow up to my ongoing effort of making the inb()/outb() and > > > > similar I/O port accessors compile-time optional. Previously I sent this as > > > > a complete treewide series titled "treewide: Remove I/O port accessors for > > > > HAS_IOPORT=n" with the latest being its 5th version[0]. Now about half of > > > > the per-subsystem patches have been merged so I'm changing over to stand > > > > alone subsystem patches. These series are stand alone and should be merged > > > > via the relevant tree such that with all subsystems complete we can follow > > > > this up with the last patch[1] that will make the I/O port accessors > > > > compile-time optional. > > > > > > Is the merge plan for each subsystem to merge this separately? I > > > acked these so they could be merged along with all the tree-wide > > > changes. > > > > Hi Björn, > > > > Yeah this went back and forth a little, sorry about that. With the > > Kconfig introduction of HAS_IOPORT merged about half of the original > > patches have been merged via subsystem maintainers or are at least > > sitting in linux-next already. Arnd was anticipating that he'll pick > > up some left overs but at the moment the simplest is for subsystems to > > pick the patches up themselves ideally and if small enough for v6.5 > > still. > > I didn't merge these in time for the v6.5 merge window. If you want > these in v6.5, it's fine with me, and it would probably make more > sense for you to bundle them with any other leftovers. > > Otherwise, let me know and I'm happy to queue them for v6.6. I provisionally put these on pci/ioport for v6.6. If you pick them up for v6.5, let me know and I'll just drop that branch. Bjorn
