Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] ACPI/PCI: Add AER bits #defines for PCIe to PCI/PCI-X Bridge

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





在 2023/4/13 0:10, Bjorn Helgaas 写道:
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 05:49:55PM +0800, LeoLiuoc wrote:

diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h b/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h
index 57b8e2ffb1dd..37f3baa336d7 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h
@@ -799,6 +799,11 @@
   #define  PCI_ERR_ROOT_AER_IRQ		0xf8000000 /* Advanced Error Interrupt Message Number */
   #define PCI_ERR_ROOT_ERR_SRC	0x34	/* Error Source Identification */
+/* PCIe advanced error reporting extended capabilities for PCIe to PCI/PCI-X Bridge */
+#define PCI_ERR_UNCOR_MASK2		0x30	/* Secondary Uncorrectable Error Mask */
+#define PCI_ERR_UNCOR_SEVER2	0x34	/* Secondary Uncorrectable Error Severit */
+#define PCI_ERR_CAP2			0x38	/* Secondary Advanced Error Capabilities */

Please squash these right up next to the other PCI_ERR_* definitions
so it's obvious that they overlap PCI_ERR_ROOT_STATUS and
PCI_ERR_ROOT_ERR_SRC (which is fine since one device can't have both),
e.g.,

    #define PCI_ERR_ROOT_STATUS     0x30
    #define  PCI_ERR_ROOT_COR_RCV           0x00000001 /* ERR_COR Received */
    ...
    #define PCI_ERR_ROOT_ERR_SRC    0x34    /* Error Source Identification */
    #define PCI_ERR_UNCOR_MASK2     0x30    /* PCIe to PCI/PCI-X bridge */
    #define PCI_ERR_UNCOR_SEVER2    0x34    /* PCIe to PCI/PCI-X bridge */
    #define PCI_ERR_CAP2            0x38    /* PCIe to PCI/PCI-X bridge */

I don't seem to understand what you mean. PCI_ERR_UNCOR_MASK2,
PCI_ERR_UNCOR_SEVER2, and PCI_ERR_CAP2 represent the control and handling of
individual errors that occur on traditional PCI or PCI-x secondary bus
interfaces, these registers are valid only for Bridge. Although
PCI_ERR_ROOT_ERR_SRC and PCI_ERR_UNCOR_SEVER2 have the same value, they
represent register definitions for different device types.

Right.  I just don't want the blank line in the middle because it
might be mistaken for items in a different capability.  All the other
AER capability registers are defined together in a block, with no
blank lines in the middle, so I think these new ones should be part of
that block.

Bjorn

Ok,I see your point. Do you think this line of comment is still necessary?
/* PCIe advanced error reporting extended capabilities for PCIe to PCI/PCI-X Bridge */

Yours sincerely,
Leoliu-oc





[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux