Lukas Wunner wrote: > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 04:30:53PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 11:10:00AM +0100, Lukas Wunner wrote: > > > Collection of DOE material, v2: > > > > Do you envision getting acks from the CXL folks and > > merging via the PCI tree, or the reverse? > > I do not have a strong preference myself. > > I've just submitted v3 and based that on pci/next. > > The patches apply equally well to cxl/next, save for a trivial conflict > in patch [13/16] due to a context change in drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h. > (I'm removing "struct xarray doe_mbs" and an adjacent new line was > added in cxl/next for "struct cxl_event_state event".) > > I recognize that it might be too late to squeeze the full series into 6.3. > However, the first 6 patches are fixes tagged for stable, so at least > those should still be fine for 6.3. > > I believe Dave Jiang is basing his in-kernel CDAT parsing on this series, > hence needs it merged during the next cycle. So if you do not want to > apply the full series for 6.3, then the last 10 patches should probably > be picked up by Dan for 6.4 early during the next cycle in support of > Dave. > > All of those ruminations are moot of couse if there are objections > requiring another respin. > > Dan, what do you think? I am ok for this to go through PCI. I will go review v3.
