On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 04:30:53PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 11:10:00AM +0100, Lukas Wunner wrote: > > Collection of DOE material, v2: > > Do you envision getting acks from the CXL folks and > merging via the PCI tree, or the reverse? I do not have a strong preference myself. I've just submitted v3 and based that on pci/next. The patches apply equally well to cxl/next, save for a trivial conflict in patch [13/16] due to a context change in drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h. (I'm removing "struct xarray doe_mbs" and an adjacent new line was added in cxl/next for "struct cxl_event_state event".) I recognize that it might be too late to squeeze the full series into 6.3. However, the first 6 patches are fixes tagged for stable, so at least those should still be fine for 6.3. I believe Dave Jiang is basing his in-kernel CDAT parsing on this series, hence needs it merged during the next cycle. So if you do not want to apply the full series for 6.3, then the last 10 patches should probably be picked up by Dan for 6.4 early during the next cycle in support of Dave. All of those ruminations are moot of couse if there are objections requiring another respin. Dan, what do you think? Thanks, Lukas
