On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Dominik Brodowski <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 01:37:44PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 02:08:34 -0800 >> > Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > >> >> We should not set the requested size to -2. >> >> >> >> that will confuse the resource list sorting with align when SIZEALIGN is used. >> >> >> >> Change to STARTALIGN and pass align from start. >> >> >> >> We are safe to do that just as we do that regular pci bridge. >> >> >> >> In the long run, we should just treat cardbus like regular pci bridge. >> >> >> >> Also fix when realloc is not passed, should keep the requested size. >> >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx> >> > >> > I'd like to see some testing on this one... Dominik? >> >> Dominik, >> >> Can you please test branch at >> >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/yinghai/linux-yinghai.git >> for-pci2 > > Tested this on my limited test systems (COUNT=1), and seems to work fine. > Thanks a lot. Thought that you should have bunch of systems (laptop) with pci cardbus slots. Found another regression by one commit already got into linus' tree. and should be fixed by [PATCH] pci: Fix pci cardbus removal http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/yinghai/linux-yinghai.git;a=patch;h=29834f2faeed3cb87dea984a3d411337752e6b7c please double check git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/yinghai/linux-yinghai.git for-pci3 or git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/yinghai/linux-yinghai.git for-pci-busn-alloc Yinghai -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
