On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 7:18 PM Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 06:32:59PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 02:59:02PM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote: > > > ... > > > > > The original patchset was and is controversial, as it is basically a > > > square peg that does not fit nicely into a round Linux hole. It took > > > 11 versions of following reviewers' suggestions until it was > > > accepted. And now it has been reverted, I am wondering if it will > > > ever be let in ag I also see that the ain or whether I should even try. > > > > The original patchset [1] may have been controversial, but that's not > > the issue here. The only thing we need to solve here is to post the > > four patches I reverted with a tiny change to one of them to avoid the > > regression. I don't think that should be a problem. > > I'll be on vacation until July 7 or 8. Just a heads-up so you know > it's not that I'm ignoring anything you may post in the meantime. Thanks Bjorn, hopefully I will send it today. At least for me, it's not so easy to get the latest Linux running on an RPi w/o running into unrelated issues. :-) Jim Quinlan Broadcom STB > > Bjorn > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220106160332.2143-1-jim2101024@xxxxxxxxx
