On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 06:32:59PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 02:59:02PM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote: > > ... > > > The original patchset was and is controversial, as it is basically a > > square peg that does not fit nicely into a round Linux hole. It took > > 11 versions of following reviewers' suggestions until it was > > accepted. And now it has been reverted, I am wondering if it will > > ever be let in again or whether I should even try. > > The original patchset [1] may have been controversial, but that's not > the issue here. The only thing we need to solve here is to post the > four patches I reverted with a tiny change to one of them to avoid the > regression. I don't think that should be a problem. I'll be on vacation until July 7 or 8. Just a heads-up so you know it's not that I'm ignoring anything you may post in the meantime. Bjorn > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220106160332.2143-1-jim2101024@xxxxxxxxx
