(2011/11/12 6:00), Yinghai Lu wrote: > > When hot remove pci express module that have pcie switch and support SRIOV, got > > [ 5918.610127] pciehp 0000:80:02.2:pcie04: pcie_isr: intr_loc 1 > [ 5918.615779] pciehp 0000:80:02.2:pcie04: Attention button interrupt received > [ 5918.622730] pciehp 0000:80:02.2:pcie04: Button pressed on Slot(3) > [ 5918.629002] pciehp 0000:80:02.2:pcie04: pciehp_get_power_status: SLOTCTRL a8 value read 1f9 > [ 5918.637416] pciehp 0000:80:02.2:pcie04: PCI slot #3 - powering off due to button press. > [ 5918.647125] pciehp 0000:80:02.2:pcie04: pcie_isr: intr_loc 10 > [ 5918.653039] pciehp 0000:80:02.2:pcie04: pciehp_green_led_blink: SLOTCTRL a8 write cmd 200 > [ 5918.661229] pciehp 0000:80:02.2:pcie04: pciehp_set_attention_status: SLOTCTRL a8 write cmd c0 > [ 5924.667627] pciehp 0000:80:02.2:pcie04: Disabling domain:bus:device=0000:b0:00 > [ 5924.674909] pciehp 0000:80:02.2:pcie04: pciehp_get_power_status: SLOTCTRL a8 value read 2f9 > [ 5924.683262] pciehp 0000:80:02.2:pcie04: pciehp_unconfigure_device: domain:bus:dev = 0000:b0:00 > [ 5924.693976] libfcoe_device_notification: NETDEV_UNREGISTER eth6 > [ 5924.764979] libfcoe_device_notification: NETDEV_UNREGISTER eth14 > [ 5924.873539] libfcoe_device_notification: NETDEV_UNREGISTER eth15 > [ 5924.995209] libfcoe_device_notification: NETDEV_UNREGISTER eth16 > [ 5926.114407] sxge 0000:b2:00.0: PCI INT A disabled > [ 5926.119342] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null) > [ 5926.127189] IP: [<ffffffff81353a3b>] pci_stop_bus_device+0x33/0x83 > [ 5926.133377] PGD 0 > [ 5926.135402] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP > [ 5926.138659] CPU 2 > [ 5926.140499] Modules linked in: > ... > [ 5926.143754] > [ 5926.275823] Call Trace: > [ 5926.278267] [<ffffffff81353a38>] pci_stop_bus_device+0x30/0x83 > [ 5926.284180] [<ffffffff81353af4>] pci_remove_bus_device+0x1a/0xba > [ 5926.290264] [<ffffffff81366311>] pciehp_unconfigure_device+0x110/0x17b > [ 5926.296866] [<ffffffff81365dd9>] ? pciehp_disable_slot+0x188/0x188 > [ 5926.303123] [<ffffffff81365d6f>] pciehp_disable_slot+0x11e/0x188 > [ 5926.309206] [<ffffffff81365e68>] pciehp_power_thread+0x8f/0xe0 > ... > > +-[0000:80]-+-00.0-[81-8f]-- > | +-01.0-[90-9f]-- > | +-02.0-[a0-af]-- > | +-02.2-[b0-bf]----00.0-[b1-b3]--+-02.0-[b2]--+-00.0 Device > | | | +-00.1 Device > | | | +-00.2 Device > | | | \-00.3 Device > | | \-03.0-[b3]--+-00.0 Device > | | +-00.1 Device > | | +-00.2 Device > | | \-00.3 Device > > root complex: 80:02.2 > pci express modules: have pcie switch and are listed as b0:00.0, b1:02.0 and b1:03.0. > end devices are b2:00.0 and b3.00.0. > VFs are: b2:00.1,... b2:00.3, and b3:00.1,...,b3:00.3 > > Root cause: when doing pci_stop_bus_device() with phys fn, it will stop virt fn and > remove the fn, so > list_for_each_safe(l, n,&bus->devices) > will have problem to refer freed n that is pointed to vf entry. > > Solution is just call pci_stop_bus_device() with phys fn only. and before that need to > save phys fn aside and avoid to use bus->devices to loop. > > During reviewing the patch, Bjorn said: > | The PCI hot-remove path calls pci_stop_bus_devices() via > | pci_remove_bus_device(). > | > | pci_stop_bus_devices() traverses the bus->devices list (point A below), > | stopping each device in turn, which calls the driver remove() method. When > | the device is an SR-IOV PF, the driver calls pci_disable_sriov(), which > | also uses pci_remove_bus_device() to remove the VF devices from the > | bus->devices list (point B). > | > | pci_remove_bus_device > | pci_stop_bus_device > | pci_stop_bus_devices(subordinate) > | list_for_each(bus->devices)<-- A > | pci_stop_bus_device(PF) > | ... > | driver->remove > | pci_disable_sriov > | ... > | pci_remove_bus_device(VF) > |<remove from bus_list> <-- B > | > | At B, we're changing the same list we're iterating through at A, so when > | the driver remove() method returns, the pci_stop_bus_devices() iterator has > | a pointer to a list entry that has already been freed. > | > | This patch avoids the problem by building a separate list of all PFs on > | the bus and traversing that at A instead of the bus->devices list. > > Discussion thread can be found : https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/10/15/141 > > -v2: updated changelog. > > Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu<yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > drivers/pci/remove.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+) > > Index: linux-2.6/drivers/pci/remove.c > =================================================================== > --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/pci/remove.c > +++ linux-2.6/drivers/pci/remove.c > @@ -120,10 +120,43 @@ void pci_remove_behind_bridge(struct pci > pci_remove_bus_device(pci_dev_b(l)); > } > > +struct dev_list { > + struct pci_dev *dev; > + struct list_head list; > +}; > + > static void pci_stop_bus_devices(struct pci_bus *bus) > { > struct list_head *l, *n; > + struct dev_list *dl, *dn; > + LIST_HEAD(physfn_list); > + > + /* Save phys_fn aside at first */ > + list_for_each(l,&bus->devices) { > + struct pci_dev *dev = pci_dev_b(l); > + > + if (!dev->is_virtfn) { > + dl = kmalloc(sizeof(*dl), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!dl) > + continue; > + dl->dev = dev; > + list_add_tail(&dl->list,&physfn_list); > + } > + } > + > + /* > + * stop bus device for phys_fn at first > + * it will stop and remove vf in driver remove action > + */ > + list_for_each_entry_safe(dl, dn,&physfn_list, list) { > + struct pci_dev *dev = dl->dev; > + > + pci_stop_bus_device(dev); > + > + kfree(dl); > + } > > + /* Do it again for left over in case */ > list_for_each_safe(l, n,&bus->devices) { > struct pci_dev *dev = pci_dev_b(l); > pci_stop_bus_device(dev); Sorry for the delayed comment. I don't think allocating new memory for device removal is good idea. And your code doesn't seem to work if memory allocation failed. What about something like below? Note that it is not tested at all, sorry. By the way, I think the root cause is that current SR-IOV design doesn't match pci device driver model very well, IMHO. Regards, Kenji Kaneshige --- drivers/pci/remove.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) Index: 20111116/drivers/pci/remove.c =================================================================== --- 20111116.orig/drivers/pci/remove.c +++ 20111116/drivers/pci/remove.c @@ -122,11 +122,25 @@ void pci_remove_behind_bridge(struct pci static void pci_stop_bus_devices(struct pci_bus *bus) { - struct list_head *l, *n; + struct list_head *pos, *head; - list_for_each_safe(l, n, &bus->devices) { - struct pci_dev *dev = pci_dev_b(l); + head = &bus->devices; + pos = head->next; + while (pos != head) { + struct pci_dev *dev = pci_dev_b(pos); + /* + * NOTE: We need special handling here because VFs are + * removed by pci_remove_bus_device() in the + * pci_stop_bus_devices() code path for PF. Seems + * current SR-IOV code doesn't match linux pci driver + * model. Need refactoring. + */ + if (dev->is_virtfn) + goto next; pci_stop_bus_device(dev); + next: + barrier(); + pos = pos->next; } } -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
