On 10/17/2011 03:12 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > Maybe this is the best we can do, but it still doesn't seem ideal, and > it's certainly not obvious when reading the code. It doesn't seem > right for the driver ->remove() method to be calling > pci_destroy_dev(). Won't the core data structures be corrupted if a > defective driver doesn't call pci_disable_sriov()? Seems like we > could end up with a device that's been physically removed, but still > has pci_dev structs hanging around. i did add some print out in pci_stop_bus_device when stop PF, that function is called for those VFs. also driver have to call pci_disable_sriov() and that is current design. Yinghai -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
