On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 3:28 AM, Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> IRQF_DISABLED is a NOOP now, place where suggest to use this
> flag also doesn't make sense any more.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@xxxxxxxxx>
I assume this will be applied via some non-PCI tree (let me know if
otherwise). The MSI-HOWTO.txt change looks fine to me.
> --- a/Documentation/scsi/ncr53c8xx.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/scsi/ncr53c8xx.txt
> @@ -786,7 +786,9 @@ port address 0x1400.
> irqm:1 same as initial settings (assumed BIOS settings)
> irqm:2 always totem pole
> irqm:0x10 driver will not use IRQF_SHARED flag when requesting irq
> - irqm:0x20 driver will not use IRQF_DISABLED flag when requesting irq
> + irqm:0x20 driver will not use IRQF_DISABLED (does not make sense
> + any more since genirq will keep irq disabled and the flag
> + is dead from linux-2.6.35) flag when requesting irq
>
> (Bits 0x10 and 0x20 can be combined with hardware irq mode option)
The new text doesn't make sense to me. I think it should say something like:
irqm:0x20 driver will not use IRQF_DISABLED flag when requesting
irq (only useful for linux-2.6.34 and earlier)
Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
