On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 2:30 PM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Nitesh, > > On Mon, Sep 13 2021 at 10:34, Nitesh Lal wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 11:25 AM Nitesh Narayan Lal <nitesh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> The drivers currently rely on irq_set_affinity_hint() to either set the > >> affinity_hint that is consumed by the userspace and/or to enforce a custom > >> affinity. > >> > >> irq_set_affinity_hint() as the name suggests is originally introduced to > >> only set the affinity_hint to help the userspace in guiding the interrupts > >> and not the affinity itself. However, since the commit > >> > >> e2e64a932556 "genirq: Set initial affinity in irq_set_affinity_hint()" > > sorry for ignoring this. It fell through the cracks. No worries, thank you for reviewing. > > > >> Thomas Gleixner (1): > >> genirq: Provide new interfaces for affinity hints > > Did I actually write this? Yeap, the idea and the initial patch came from you. :) > > > > Any suggestions on what should be the next steps here? Unfortunately, I haven't > > been able to get any reviews on the following two patches: > > be2net: Use irq_update_affinity_hint > > hinic: Use irq_set_affinity_and_hint > > > > One option would be to proceed with the remaining patches and I can try > > posting these two again when I post patches for the remaining drivers? > > The more general question is whether I should queue all the others or > whether some subsystem would prefer to pull in a tagged commit on top of > rc1. I'm happy to carry them all of course. > I am fine either way. In the past, while I was asking for more testing help I was asked if the SCSI changes are part of Martins's scsi-fixes tree as that's something Broadcom folks test to check for regression. So, maybe Martin can pull this up? -- Thanks Nitesh
