> -----Original Message----- > From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@xxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Thursday, November 4, 2021 9:45 AM > To: Hongxing Zhu <hongxing.zhu@xxxxxxx> > Cc: l.stach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx; > robh@xxxxxxxxxx; bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: imx6: Allow to probe when > dw_pcie_wait_for_link() fails > > Hi Richard, > > On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 9:58 PM Hongxing Zhu <hongxing.zhu@xxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > [Richard Zhu] Hi Fabio: > > First of all, thanks for your help to care this bug. > > This dump is planned to be fixed in the #5 patch of '[v4,0/6] PCI: > > imx6: refine codes and add compliance tests mode support' > > > "https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fp > atchwork.kernel.org%2Fproject%2Flinux-arm-kernel%2Fcover%2F163574 > 7478-25562-1-git-send-email-hongxing.zhu%40nxp.com%2F&data= > 04%7C01%7Chongxing.zhu%40nxp.com%7Ca96f456b0a004a4da69008d9 > 9f34bb8b%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C1%7C6377 > 15871101762967%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwM > DAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000& > sdata=bZInvFrlHI8VmWiIS2oxfraSCFAEhWmPG%2BtHLwNHD7A%3D&am > p;reserved=0" > > Ok, great. Since this patch 5/6 is a bug fix, could you re-order this series so > that the bug fix is the first one in the series? > > This makes it easier for the backport to stable. > > Patch 1/6 is just a cleanup and could go further. [Richard Zhu] Hi Fabio: The #5 patch relies on the changes of #2-4 patches. And the #1 patch make the changes of #2 easier. It's better to keep the sequence of the v4 series. BR Richard > > Thanks