On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 10:40:48AM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 03:37:16PM +0100, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > Em Mon, 18 Oct 2021 11:21:27 +0100 > > Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx> escreveu: > > > > > On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 08:07:34AM +0100, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > > > This driver currently doesn't call dw_pcie_host_deinit() > > > > at the .remove() callback. This can cause an OOPS if the driver > > > > is unbound. > > > > > > This looks like a fix, it has to be marked as such. > > > > Well, without patch 10/10, the .remove() ops won't be called, > > so, it is not really a fix, but I can surely add a c/c > > stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and add a Fixes: tag here. > > You have a point - unless we send patch 10 to stable as well I > would not tag it then. > > > > > While here, add a poweroff function, in order to abstract > > > > between the internal and external PHY logic. > > > > > > > > Acked-by: Xiaowei Song <songxiaowei@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > > > > > See [PATCH v13 00/10] at: https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1634539769.git.mchehab+huawei@xxxxxxxxxx/ > > > > > > > > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-kirin.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++--------- > > > > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-kirin.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-kirin.c > > > > index b17a194cf78d..ffc63d12f8ed 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-kirin.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-kirin.c > > > > @@ -680,6 +680,23 @@ static const struct dw_pcie_host_ops kirin_pcie_host_ops = { > > > > .host_init = kirin_pcie_host_init, > > > > }; > > > > > > > > +static int kirin_pcie_power_off(struct kirin_pcie *kirin_pcie) > > > > +{ > > > > + int i; > > > > + > > > > + if (kirin_pcie->type == PCIE_KIRIN_INTERNAL_PHY) > > > > + return hi3660_pcie_phy_power_off(kirin_pcie); > > > > + > > > > + for (i = 0; i < kirin_pcie->n_gpio_clkreq; i++) { > > > > + gpio_direction_output(kirin_pcie->gpio_id_clkreq[i], 1); > > > > + } > > > > > > It looks like you are adding functionality here (ie gpio), not > > > just wrapping common code in a function. > > > > It is just reverting the power on logic there. > > What I am saying is that executing: > > for (i = 0; i < kirin_pcie->n_gpio_clkreq; i++) > gpio_direction_output(kirin_pcie->gpio_id_clkreq[i], 1); > > is an addition to what current code does AFAICS (ie you are not just > moving code into a function - kirin_pcie_power_off(), you are adding > to it), it is a logical change that belongs in a separate patch. > > There are two logical changes: > > - Adding dw_pcie_host_deinit() > - Moving PHY power off code into kirin_pcie_power_off() (and adding > gpio handling in it) > > That's what I read from the diffstat, please correct me if I am wrong. Hi Mauro, any comment on the above ? It is the last question I have before merging the series, please let me know. Thanks, Lorenzo
