Re: [PATCH 0/7] cxl_pci refactor for reusability

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 21-09-21 15:28:21, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 3:05 PM Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Provide the ability to obtain CXL register blocks as discrete functionality.
> > This functionality will become useful for other CXL drivers that need access to
> > CXL register blocks. It is also in line with other additions to core which moves
> > register mapping functionality.
> >
> > At the introduction of the CXL driver the only user of CXL MMIO was cxl_pci
> > (then known as cxl_mem). As the driver has evolved it is clear that cxl_pci will
> > not be the only entity that needs access to CXL MMIO. This series stops short of
> > moving the generalized functionality into cxl_core for the sake of getting eyes
> > on the important foundational bits sooner rather than later. The ultimate plan
> > is to move much of the code into cxl_core.
> >
> > Via review of two previous patches [1] & [2] it has been suggested that the bits
> > which are being used for DVSEC enumeration move into PCI core. As CXL core is
> > soon going to require these, let's try to get the ball rolling now on making
> > that happen.
> >
> > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/20210920225638.1729482-1-ben.widawsky@xxxxxxxxx/
> > [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/20210920225638.1729482-1-ben.widawsky@xxxxxxxxx/
> >
> > Ben Widawsky (7):
> >   cxl: Convert "RBI" to enum
> >   cxl/pci: Remove dev_dbg for unknown register blocks
> >   cxl/pci: Refactor cxl_pci_setup_regs
> >   cxl/pci: Make more use of cxl_register_map
> >   PCI: Add pci_find_dvsec_capability to find designated VSEC
> >   cxl/pci: Use pci core's DVSEC functionality
> >   ocxl: Use pci core's DVSEC functionality
> 
> I also found:
> 
> siov_find_pci_dvsec()

Hadn't seen this one... Thanks.

> 
> ...and an open coded one in:
> 
> drivers/mfd/intel_pmt.c::pmt_pci_probe()

I had spotted this one previously

> 
> This one looks too weird to replace:
> 
> arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_discovery.c::intel_uncore_has_discovery_tables()
> 
> In any event I'd expect this cover to also be cc'd to those folks.

I did Cc OCXL in the relevant patch, I don't think they need most of the
background in the cover letter (I also did Cc David Box who maintains
intel_pmt). I'll add them to the cover letter here shortly...




[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux