Reviewed-by: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@xxxxxxxxxx>
On 5/4/2021 10:47 PM, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
As spotted by checkpatch, use 'seq_puts' instead of 'seq_printf' when
possible.
It is slightly more efficient.
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/pci/controller/pci-tegra.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-tegra.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-tegra.c
index 006bf0346dec..fe8e21ce3e3d 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-tegra.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-tegra.c
@@ -2550,7 +2550,7 @@ static void *tegra_pcie_ports_seq_start(struct seq_file *s, loff_t *pos)
if (list_empty(&pcie->ports))
return NULL;
- seq_printf(s, "Index Status\n");
+ seq_puts(s, "Index Status\n");
return seq_list_start(&pcie->ports, *pos);
}
@@ -2587,16 +2587,16 @@ static int tegra_pcie_ports_seq_show(struct seq_file *s, void *v)
seq_printf(s, "%2u ", port->index);
if (up)
- seq_printf(s, "up");
+ seq_puts(s, "up");
if (active) {
if (up)
- seq_printf(s, ", ");
+ seq_puts(s, ", ");
- seq_printf(s, "active");
+ seq_puts(s, "active");
}
- seq_printf(s, "\n");
+ seq_puts(s, "\n");
return 0;
}
